- The Washington Times - Thursday, September 6, 2001

A key Senate Democrat yesterday endorsed President Bush's bid for up to $18.4 billion in extra defense dollars next year as the GOP searches for the 60 Senate votes needed to make the first payment on the president's military transformation.
"I, for one, believe it is essential that we provide the resources necessary for defense," said Sen. Daniel K. Inouye, Hawaii Democrat and chairman of the Senate Appropriations subcommittee on defense. "It would be easy to play politics on this issue, but this is too important, and so I will not take part in any effort which could shortchange national defense for political gain."
Mr. Inouye's remarks came at a hearing during which Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld reiterated that the administration is sticking by its total request of $329 billion in fiscal 2002 to shore up readiness lost in the 1990s and to improve health care.
Democrats have charged that Mr. Bush's tax cut, and a slowing economy, will force lawmakers to dip into Social Security surpluses that would otherwise be used to pay down the national debt.
Amid the partisan atmosphere, Mr. Inouye is an important new ally for Mr. Bush as a showdown is brewing between the president and Senate Democratic leaders over the size of defense spending.
Because the White House's $18.4 billion request came late in the process, the Senate and House budget resolutions set defense spending at lower levels. This means pro-defense senators will have to muster 60 votes to bypass the resolution if a senator objects to approving the higher number.
Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, South Dakota Democrat, and Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, North Dakota Democrat, have sent signals they may oppose much of the increase in favor of more domestic spending.
Mr. Conrad, who has mounted a near-daily attack on Mr. Bush's tax cut as the cause of reduced surplus estimates, is said to want to approve as little as $4 billion in new defense dollars.
"A real intramural struggle is developing within the Democratic caucus," said a Senate aide. "The question is, can Daschle instill enough party discipline on this vote?"
If all 49 Senate Republicans voted for the $18.4 billion increase, 11 Democrats would have to join them to reach the 60-vote requirement.
"We need every nickel of it," Mr. Rumsfeld testified yesterday. "The budget request does not solve the problems of the department. It begins to repair the damage that's been done by a long period of underfunding and overuse. In addition, it lays the foundation for the effort to transform the armed forces for the 21st century."
Republican House and Senate leadership aides yesterday reached agreement to seek discretionary spending of $679 billion in fiscal 2002. That would provide enough room to add President Bush's $18 billion supplemental defense request to the existing budget.
Mr. Inouye said he endorses a 60-vote waiver.
Sen. Pete V. Domenici, New Mexico Republican, said he believes there are sufficient non-Social Security surpluses to pay for Mr. Bush's defense increases. Only actual budget outlays count against the surplus. Of the $18.4 billion request, about half will actually turn into outlays during the next fiscal year.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide