- The Washington Times - Monday, April 1, 2002

Former President Bill Clinton says he regrets the last-minute pardon he gave to fugitive financier Marc Rich because it has tarnished his reputation.
Asked if he would do it again, "probably not, just for the politics," he said in an interview with Newsweek magazine. "It was terrible politics. It wasn't worth the damage to my reputation. But that doesn't mean the attacks were true."
A list of 177 pardons and clemencies was released by the Clinton White House just hours before Mr. Clinton left office and President Bush was sworn in on Jan. 20, 2001.
Since then, Mr. Clinton's pardons have been investigated by federal prosecutors and Congress. That scrutiny, Mr. Clinton said, made him "just angry that after I worked so hard, and after all that money had been spent proving that I never did anything wrong for money, that I'd get mugged one more time on the way out the door."
Mr. Rich was indicted in 1983 on federal charges accusing him of evading more than $48 million in income taxes and illegally buying oil from Iran during the 1979 hostage crisis. He left the United States before the indictment and now lives in Switzerland.
Mr. Rich's ex-wife, Denise Rich, is a major financial contributor to the Democratic Party and to Mr. Clinton's presidential library.
The House Government Reform Committee said in a report last month that the Rich pardon "raised substantial questions of direct corruption, primarily whether pardons were issued in exchange for political and other financial contributions."
Federal investigators in New York are investigating whether any of Mr. Clinton's last-minute pardons were offered in exchange for contributions.
Mr. Clinton denied all wrongdoing in regard to the Rich pardon. "The fact that his ex-wife … was for it and had contributed to my library had nothing to do with it," the Newsweek interview released yesterday quoted him as saying.
"People are free to say that they disagreed with this or that part of the decisions I made, but there wasn't a shred of evidence that it had been done for any improper motive," Mr. Clinton said. "In fact, there is a lot of evidence to the contrary. I thought there was a little bit of a double standard in the way I was treated, to put it mildly. And I still do."
Mr. Clinton did say he was a little more open to Mr. Rich's claim of prosecutorial abuse because of all the investigations he endured as president.
"I don't know Marc Rich and wouldn't know him if he walked in the door there," Mr. Clinton said. But, he added, "I was very sensitive to prosecutorial abuse because I had seen it. … I don't think that's all bad for a president to be sensitive to any kind of abuse of power."

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide