- The Washington Times - Tuesday, April 2, 2002

SAN JOSE, Calif. (AP) Hewlett-Packard Co.'s board rescinded an olive branch to dissident director Walter Hewlett yesterday, reversing a plan to renominate him after he sued to try to stop the merger with Compaq Computer Corp.

Though Mr. Hewlett no longer will sit on the board, the move is unlikely to end or quiet the feud between company officials and the co-founder's son over the $19 billion union of computer giants.

After HP Chief Executive Carly Fiorina claimed a slim victory in the fight for shareholder approval, board members met with Mr. Hewlett "to develop a constructive working relationship," HP said.

The full board met with Mr. Hewlett on Wednesday and unanimously decided to renominate him. He then filed suit to stop the merger, which has yet to be approved.

"My fellow board members and I were … shocked when just hours later Walter Hewlett filed a spurious lawsuit against the company," said Sam Ginn, chairman of the nominating and governance committee.

In the lawsuit filed Thursday in Delaware, Mr. Hewlett claimed that the investment arm of Deutsche Bank switched its vote at the last minute after HP threatened to take away future business.

Mr. Hewlett also said HP misled investors about the progress of plans to integrate its massive organization with Compaq's. He said HP executives lied about their ability to achieve the deal's financial targets without exceeding their prediction of 15,000 job cuts.

The lawsuit, which HP calls baseless, seeks to invalidate the vote by HP shareholders and declare the merger defeated or order a new election. HP and Compaq are incorporated in Delaware.

Mr. Hewlett, who has said he would work to support the integration if the deal closed, issued a statement yesterday saying the board's decision was regrettable.

"It is unfortunate that the HP board has seemingly missed what the company's stockholders have clearly recognized: that dissent is not disloyalty, that healthy boards need not agree on every issue," he said.

David Katz, president of Matrix Asset Advisors and a merger opponent, said the decision comes at a time when investors are looking for independence on corporate boards.

"Here's a strong comment by a board who says, 'We love you as long as you're with us. If you're against us, we're not going to have you there,'" he said.

In a rare news conference after the March 19 shareholder meeting, Mr. Hewlett, who has served on the board for 15 years, said he would like to remain active with the company. That was despite months of sometimes personal attacks from both sides, including a company advertisement belittling Mr. Hewlett as a musician and academic with no real business experience.

Yesterday, the company's statement cited concerns about his "lack of candor and issues of trust."

John Coffee, a Columbia University law professor who advised the board after the lawsuit, said the directors were surprised Mr. Hewlett had not mentioned his planned lawsuit during their talks preceding the filing.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide