- The Washington Times - Wednesday, August 7, 2002

Former Vice President Al Gore has finally gotten around to questioning presidential ethics. Unfortunately, the ethics he questions are not those of former President Clinton, who had none, but of President Bush, whom polls show the public trusts.

In a New York Times column last Sunday, Mr. Gore tipped his hand on where he's headed with his first sentence: "There has always been a debate over the destiny of this nation between those who believed they were entitled to govern because of their station in life, and those who believed that the people were sovereign."

Who would know more about being "to the manor born" than Mr. Gore, whose father, the late Sen. Albert Gore Sr., reared his son in a pricey Washington hotel and sent him to a pricey private school so he wouldn't have to associate with public school riff-raff? Today, Mr. Gore takes the side of the rich against the poor by opposing school choice, which would give everyone the opportunity to have the same quality education his parents could afford.

Before Mr. Gore starts attacking the honesty and integrity of Mr. Bush, perhaps he should be reminded of the eight years he spent defending and dissembling for Mr. Clinton, the most ethically vacuous president certainly since Warren Harding and perhaps in history. Has it been so long that Mr. Gore can't remember dialing for campaign dollars inside the White House, or those White House "coffees" that raised millions in campaign cash, or the treatment of the Lincoln Bedroom as a five-star Motel 6, or Mr. Clinton's statement, "I did not have sex with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky," or the lying under oath and impeachment of his former boss, or Mr. Gore's association with shady Chinese "businessmen" who raised gobs of foreign cash for Clinton-Gore that had to be returned because it violated federal election laws?

Through all of this, one never heard Mr. Gore question Mr. Clinton's ethics, or his own and he now brazenly questions the ethics of Mr. Bush?

Mr. Gore himself is ethically challenged. In addition to the claim that he invented the Internet, Mr. Gore once praised tobacco growers, only to later join in demonizing them when it became politically expedient. Former Sen. Alan Simpson, Wyoming Republican, recalls Mr. Gore approaching then-Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole to request extra time for a Senate speech Mr. Gore intended to make in favor of using U.S. troops in the 1991 Gulf War. Mr. Gore reportedly told Mr. Dole he would vote against a Senate resolution endorsing U.S. military action in Kuwait unless he got more time to speak. (Mr. Gore once claimed to hold a pro-life position on principle but later flipped when polls indicated he couldn't get the presidential nomination of his party unless he was pro-choice.)

In the Aug. 4 New York Times column, Mr. Gore again tried to position himself as a populist, but that doesn't even wash with his 2000 running mate, Sen. Joe Lieberman, Connecticut Democrat. In an Associated Press story last week, Mr. Lieberman said Mr. Gore's populist message was inconsistent with his previous record and "ultimately hurt" their 2000 campaign, making it "more difficult for us to gain the support of some of the middle class, independent voters who don't see America as 'us vs. them.'"

Sen. Evan Bayh, Indiana Democrat, quoted in the Aug. 2 Dallas Morning News, said, "I disagreed with the strategy in the last campaign. I think it was wrong, and I also think it doesn't work."

Clinton Transportation Secretary Rodney Slater agrees. At a recent gathering of the Democratic Leadership Council, Mr. Slater said that by hanging onto a populist strategy, Democrats "were in danger of slipping back to pre-1992, and that has be checked."

"Pre-1992" would refer to the disastrous (for Democrats) candidacies of Michael Dukakis, Walter Mondale and even George McGovern. If Mr. Gore wants to return to those thrilling days of liberal yesteryear, Republicans will be delighted to see him go. They might even ask to see his ACLU membership card and question his ethics.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide