- The Washington Times - Tuesday, December 10, 2002

A week after suffering a major tax-policy defeat, Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill resigned his post. But wait a minute it turns out he was asked to step down by President Bush. That news dribbled out after Mr. O'Neill's press conference Friday, and in some sense it is a very important part of this shakeup.

Many observers believed George W. Bush the MBA president was incapable of firing anybody. Putting it somewhat more mildly, many thought the president was too loyal to his appointees. (Former Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Harvey Pitt might be the best example of this overly generous loyalty.) As it turns out, Mr. Bush has put tax cuts and the economy ahead of any one top-level staffer.

Of course, for many months, people on all sides of the political spectrum have been calling for Mr. O'Neill's head. Conservatives were early on this call as it became clear he had no sympathy with the supply-side model of tax-rate incentives to spur work and investment. Instead, he almost always argued demand-side theories that focused on consumer spending. Those failed Keynesian-type arguments were a great irritant to the supply-side fraternity.

Last week, Mr. O'Neill lost a critical policy debate to chief economic adviser Glenn Hubbard over a big-bang economic package that includes dividend tax cuts, faster implementation of last year's personal tax cut, business investment incentives, enlarged supersaver individual retirement accounts, and other measures such as tort reform to curb legal abuses. Having lost this battle, it must have been quite clear to the president that it would be impossible for Mr. O'Neill to defend and market the new tax-cut package, which will undoubtedly be the center of next year's domestic agenda. Basically, Mr. O'Neill didn't buy into the package and he couldn't defend it, so Mr. Bush cut him off.

Mr. O'Neill never had any credibility on Capitol Hill or Wall Street. He dismissed the former as buffoons and the latter as irrelevant. So naturally, as the stock-market decline continued for most of this year, almost nobody on the planet defended Mr. O'Neill and almost everybody criticized him. Finally, Mr. Bush had enough.

Who to replace him with? White House insiders said a new Treasury appointee must be a true believer in the new tax-cut growth package, must be vetted and confirmed quickly, must be able to start quickly, and must "know how the place works."

The president announced his choice yesterday John W. Snow, chairman of the transportation and railroad conglomerate CSX Corp. At a White House news conference, Mr. Snow said he would "advance a pro-growth, pro-jobs agenda."

So, who's the winner in all of this? Glenn Hubbard. It is expected that Mr. Hubbard, a key designer of the big-bang tax package, is likely to be put in charge of the National Economic Council as Larry Lindsey is vacating that position to move to the private sector. (Mr. Hubbard would retain his Council of Economic Advisers post, essentially merging the two staffs.) A former economics professor at Columbia University, Mr. Hubbard is articulate, has strong supply-side views, and has been a rising star in the Bush White House.

Another winner will be the American economy. You wouldn't know it from listening to all the naysayers out there, but the U.S. economy has increased four consecutive quarters for an average growth rate of 3 percent with a 5 percent increase in productivity. Considering the terrorist bombings, the war, unprecedented corporate corruption, a plunging stock market, and new jitters over an anticipated invasion of Iraq, it's a miracle the economy has grown at all in the past year.

But the president now wants that 3 percent growth to turn into 5 percent. And that is why he's coming back with an aggressive new growth package and presumably some dynamic new officials to shepherd it through.

Our MBA president knows all about the benefits of an expanding and profitable business. Now he's searching for some new executives to apply the same lessons to the economy.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide