- The Washington Times - Monday, February 11, 2002

One can certainly understand why papers like the Atlanta Journal and Constitution ("Extremist judge unfit to sit on appeals court") and the Los Angeles Times ("Say no to this throwback") are so upset about Charles Pickering, President Bush's nominee for the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. After all, the man once testified as a character witness for the Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan.
What's that, you say? He testified against the Grand Wizard? In Mississippi? In 1967? Putting himself at political and personal risk? Oh. You say he was a local prosecutor who lost his bid for re-election because he stood up to the Klan? Hmmm.
You say this man Pickering, who has been a federal judge (confirmed by the Senate) for 11 years, was asked by Mississippi's governor to serve on the executive committee of the Institute of Racial Reconciliation at Ole Miss? What? He was the one who urged the state's governor and the chancellor of the university to create the institute in the first place?
Who's been feeding you this stuff? James Charles Evers? You mean the brother of slain civil-rights hero Medgar Evers? He's defending this "extremist" in the pages of the Wall Street Journal? Hmmm.
People for the American Way, the Alliance for Justice and other members in good standing of the character assassination coalition have been faxing false accusations about Judge Pickering far and wide. Some of those faxes landed on Mr. Evers' desk. Mr. Evers, who has known Judge Pickering for decades, was "saddened and appalled to read many of the allegations that have been put forth about Judge Pickering made by groups with a Washington D.C. address and a political agenda" and without real knowledge of "Pickering's long and distinguished record on civil rights."
Mr. Evers notes that Judge Pickering did more than face down the Klan. While in private practice, he defended an African-American man accused of robbing a white 16-year-old at knifepoint. After two trials, the man was acquitted.
People for the American Way is making much of a 1990 denial by Judge Pickering that he ever had contact with the racist Mississippi Sovereignty Commission. PFAW has uncovered a phone call with a commission staffer dating to 1972. But that phone call dealt with Judge Pickering's concern over a labor dispute in Jones County. According to reporting by National Review's Byron York, the KKK had been making trouble, and Judge Pickering, then a state senator representing Jones County, was keeping tabs on the situation. That one phone call is the entirety of Judge Pickering's "contact" with the Sovereignty Commission.
As a federal judge, Charles Pickering once overturned a damage award in a civil case because he believed the jury was biased against the plaintiffs, an interracial couple. He ordered that the matter of damages be retried, and the award for the couple was thus increased.
Well, say the liberal activists, Judge Pickering joined a law firm one of whose partners was a former segregationist. How many Southern law firms in the 1970s did not contain former segregationists? The Supreme Court of the United States and the United States Senate both contain or have contained not just former segregationists but former members of the KKK. The key term is "former" "Was blind but now I see." Besides, we are talking here of a law partner, not Judge Pickering himself, who never was a segregationist. The very worst the mudslingers on the left could find about the fellow was a 1959 law review article in which Judge Pickering pointed out the poor wording of an anti-miscegenation statute. The 21-year-old Charles Pickering did not, in the article, make the case against the law.
But in a four-decade career in the law, Judge Pickering has shown himself to be an eminently fair and reasonable jurist. He has recommended to some convicted felons that all was not lost; that they still might turn their lives around by participating in Chuck Colson's Prison Fellowship. Oops, another red flag. PFAW says this is evidence of Judge Pickering's "disregard for the separation of church and state."
This attack on Judge Pickering is so obviously malicious and in such bad faith that one wonders why anyone takes these liberal groups seriously anymore. They have cried wolf so many times about so many honorable men and women that they have brought shame on themselves. They have become the thing they claimed to detest: McCarthyites.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide