- The Washington Times - Saturday, February 23, 2002

Florence King's column is the best reason for reading National Review. Her "Misanthrope's Corner," placed on the magazine's last page, makes National Review a publication that is read from back to front.
In her latest in the Feb. 25 issue, Miss King relates the relief expressed by her driving instructor when he discovered she was Miss King and not Miss Ling: "Last [derogatory term for Oriental] I had put us both in the hospital."
The driving school's secretary had hit "L" instead of "K" on the typewriter key, sending the instructor into a fit of panic and hypertension. Relieved from the fear instilled by a typo, the instructor gave Miss King his views on why Asians should not be permitted to operate motor vehicles.
This incident occurred, of course, in the distant past 1974. That was a year when Americans still had freedom of speech, the exercise of which had not yet been turned into a hate crime by what Miss King lampoons as "the MultiCulties."
Nowadays, writes Miss King, "my instructor would automatically assume that the white stranger beside him was an avenging angel of diversity tuned to a perpetual frequency of High Snitch. He would know that one little 'hate speech' is all it would take to get fired, sued and condemned to wander through the secular purgatory of community service while the talk shows debated his status as Satan Incarnate."
Miss King's observations were still in mind when I read reports of the arrest this month of 10 black males for a series of racial attacks on white University of Virginia students in Charlottesville. According to police, the attacks were not a town-grown conflict, nor were the assaults motivated by rape or robbery. The students were simply beaten for being white.
The national media are too politically correct to report black-on-white hate crimes, which leaves Americans ignorant of the growing incidence of such crimes. Local newspapers sometimes report these crimes if they occur within the city limits. Otherwise, there are only the police reports.
The politically correct Charlottesville mayor, Blake Caravati, is busily at work adjusting the facts. In Mayor Caravati's MultiCulti-speak, the crimes have become "incidents." Charlottesville's political leader also dismissed the description, given by the police and the assailants themselves, of the physical assaults as "race-based." Whether the beatings were racially motivated, says his honor, is "yet to be determined by the commonwealth's attorney."
The mayor went on to express his sympathy for the assailants and their families, who, unlike the victims, are local residents and voters.
The white students were lucky they were set upon and beaten before they had time to open their mouths. If the black assailants had been smarter, they could have given the whites a jail term instead of a beating.
If instead of delivering blows, the black assailants had informed the whites of what they thought of their girlfriends and mothers, they might have stirred enough anger to elicit verbal responses, perhaps even a racial epithet, that would qualify as hate speech. Maybe a white student would even have heaven forbid struck a black tormentor.
Goaded into committing hate crimes, the arrested whites would be national news, and Mayor Caravati would not be making apologies for them.
Miss King is correct that her driving instructor can no longer express his views on Asian driving students. This same inhibition means no white can respond in kind to verbal assaults from a "protected minority" without being arrested for a hate crime.
Racial privilege is a fact of U.S. law. Recently, in Idaho a white husband was arrested by white police, prosecuted by a white prosecutor, convicted by a white jury, and sentenced to jail by a white judge for coming to the defense of his white wife who was physically assaulted by a black male. You can read all about it on www.vdare.com.
The black's physical assault on the wife was minor, but the husband's verbal assault was not. The enraged husband used the n-word.
White males had best give up any idea of defending their women or themselves, and women should not confuse their men's aversion to jail with cowardice. America has returned to the feudal age when legally privileged nobles could assault commoners at will, but woe to any commoner who returned the compliment.
This extraordinary inequality is what we owe to the Civil Rights movement, white male presidents, white legislators and white attorneys general.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide