- The Washington Times - Tuesday, February 26, 2002

Hillary and Laura. The contrasts are endlessly striking: blonde versus brunette, policy wonk versus librarian, a betrayed wife versus America's mother."If you ever wanted a contrast, you've got it with these two women," says Betty Winfield, a University of Missouri journalism professor.
Although they share one major characteristic both are mothers of daughters, but not sons Mrs. Clinton emphasizes her maiden name, "Rodham"; the current first lady never refers to "Welch."
"Mrs. Bush apparently has a much more wholesome and solid marriage." says ArLyne Diamond, Management Consultant for Diamond Associates in California. "It is based on love and respect, in addition to a political business partnership."
Some have typecast her as the "anti-Hillary" a woman determined to be much of what Mrs. Clinton is not: noncontroversial, subordinate to her husband, determined to stay in the background.
"Hillary is an ambitious, engaged policy wonk in her own right, who happened to be married to a president," says June Sager Speakman, a professor at Roger Williams University in Bristol, R.I. "Laura, on the other hand, is a librarian and mother who also happens to be married to a president."
Mrs. Bush is not much for one-liners. Even under the prompting of "The Tonight Show" host Jay Leno on Feb. 11, her best lines amounted to how "it's been a really unbelievable opportunity" being the first lady during a time of terrorism.
"It's really comforting to be able to make contributions," she added.
"Laura seems to fade into the woodwork and doesn't present even a good target for pointed humor," says organizational consultant Patricia Wiklund, owner of Wiklund and Associates in Silicon Valley, Calif. "Laura is so self-effacing that it is hard to find her sometimes."
Even the Chinese were a bit perplexed during the first lady's visit last week to China.
"Hillary was always supportive of feminist causes," Xie Lihua, editor of a Chinese women's magazine told Cox News Service. "I feel Mrs. Bush in this regard doesn't have that much to really attract us. I think her dialogue is just a formality."
America is interested in the 55-year-old longtime companion to George W. Bush, but how does one view a former librarian who has shied away from the public eye and hasn't had her own career since she married in 1977? She is not even the most powerful woman in America, according to Ladies Home Journal, who awards that distinction to talk-show diva Oprah Winfrey.
"Laura Bush gave speeches on education, but kept out of the limelight for the most part until September 11. Now she is out there more, but still she's in a helpmate role," says Judith Trent, professor of communication at the University of Cincinnati.
The first book on Mrs. Bush will be published in March, 15 months into her husband's presidency. "Laura: America's First Lady, First Mother" is described by author Antonia Felix as "steady, down to earth, intelligent and passionate about the things she cares about."
"She is not quite as traditional as most would think," the author says, "as she didn't get married until she was 31." The author was unable to get access to the first lady herself and was reduced to relying on Jenna Welch, Laura's mother, and others from her hometown.
The first lady's office says Mrs. Bush has yet to respond to the many book-interview requests she has received.
The role of first lady can be difficult, requiring a delicate balance to avoid criticism of too much or too little involvement in the nation's business. Unlike Mrs. Clinton, who jumped feet first into an ultimately unsuccessful effort to change public health policy, Mrs. Bush's biggest foray into politics was her Nov. 17 radio address about the Taliban's oppression of Afghan women.
In his new book, "Ambling into History," New York Times writer Frank Bruni suggests Mrs. Bush is not as humorless and unimaginative as she might lead people to believe. With those she trusts, he writes, she is sassy, bums cigarettes off close friends and has been "the perfect foil for her husband and the perfect ballast."
"He could take up so much of the room precisely because she demanded so little of it," Mr. Bruni writes.
In a report released by the Pew Research Center in July, Mrs. Bush was described as "nice," "ladylike," "classy," "intelligent" and "quiet." In a similar 1996 poll, Mrs. Clinton was described as "intelligent," "smart," "aggressive" and "domineering." Only 6 percent of those polled said Mrs. Bush had too much influence on the administration, compared with a 1993 Pew poll showing 40 percent thought Mrs. Clinton had too much influence.
Mrs. Clinton, widely considered to have broken the first lady mold, took Eleanor Roosevelt as her model and was viewed by many as the "co-president," living up to her husband's claim that they were "two for the price of one."
Each woman has pursued vastly different agendas.
"Laura's much more in keeping with other first ladies, including her mother-in-law. Hillary's agenda was much bigger; in fact, probably all-inclusive," Ms. Speakman says.
Laura Bush has followed the example of her mother-in-law, former first lady Barbara Bush, by not speaking on policy issues, but rather focusing on literacy, reading and child development.
She has broken with her husband openly on only one issue: abortion.
When asked during an interview on NBC's "Today" show in January 2001 about the 1973 Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade, "I don't think that it should be overturned," Mrs. Bush said. However, she has not made a comment publicly on that issue since. Mrs. Clinton appeared at luncheons sponsored by the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League to put forth her point of view.
Still, Mrs. Bush "is not simply a mouthpiece for her husband, but has her own mind," Ms. Felix says.
After eight years in the White House, a cottage industry of books about Mrs. Clinton had emerged. Judith Warner's "Hillary Clinton: The Inside Story" crowned the first lady as "America's most intriguing woman," while former Reagan administration speechwriter Peggy Noonan trashed her in "The Case Against Hillary Clinton."
The first publications began hitting bookstores mid-1993, just months after Bill Clinton took office, and came fast and furious ever after. Author Gail Sheehy was able to get rare access interviews with the Clintons to enhance her book, "Hillary's Choice."
"She [Hillary] had a much more in-your-face first year," Miss Trent says.
In terms of its first ladies, Mrs. Bush has let America know the Bush years will be nothing like the Clinton years.
"Hillary was unique in how she filled the position of first lady," Ms. Speakman says. "Laura is in keeping with past patterns."

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide