- The Washington Times - Tuesday, January 22, 2002

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) Genetic engineers who have spent years fighting diseases face a dismaying paradox in the post-September 11 world: Many of their impressive breakthroughs can also be used for sinister purposes.

Genetic maps of many disease-causing viruses and bacteria are now available to anyone with an Internet connection. Techniques that can make pathogens more deadly are publicized in scientific journals.

Some scientists fear that information made public with the most altruistic of intentions may also help terrorists create biological weapons laced with genetically modified superbugs. Such germs are created by splicing drug-resistant genes into diseases normally defeated by vaccines.

"This is the double-edged sword of biotechnology," said Dr. Vito Del Vecchio, a University of Scranton researcher in Pennsylvania who this month published the genome, or genetic blueprint, of the Malta fever pathogen, which can cause severe flulike symptoms.

Dr. Del Vecchio and an international team of scientists deciphered the bug's genome in order to understand what makes the microbe virulent and to possibly create a vaccine. But no vaccine yet exists, and meanwhile, that same information could be used to engineer a drug-resistant biological weapon.

While researchers like Dr. Del Vecchio scramble to devise ways to detect and defend against biological weapons, others may be working to genetically engineer around these efforts.

At least six countries Britain, France, Germany, Iraq, Japan and the United States plus the former Soviet Union, either have or once had major biological-weapons programs.

It's never been easier to tweak a bug's genes to make it antibiotic-resistant or more potent, or to transfer a germ's deadly properties to a normally benign microbe.

"It's a fairly straightforward process," said Stanford University microbiologist Steve Block.

Dr. James Baker Jr., a University of Michigan bioterrorism expert, said most microbiologists suspect that someone somewhere is trying to use these genetic-engineering techniques to make biological weapons more deadly.

"I think Ken Alibek gave that 'gift' to the world," Mr. Baker said.

As second in command of the Soviet biological-warfare program, Mr. Alibek did more than dabble with genetically engineered diseases, the blackest of biotechnology's black arts. His genetic tinkering improved the virulence and antibiotic resistance of a variety of diseases, from anthrax to smallpox.

Mr. Alibek's goal was to make merely debilitating diseases deadly, and deadly pathogens resistant to vaccines. Now, he's working to undo his legacy, joining other U.S. researchers in a frantic biological-arms race against an unknown enemy.

Their task is made more difficult by the wealth of publicly available biological-warfare information.

Mr. Alibek says obtaining superbug recipes could be as easy as digging up old Russian scientific journals where his colleagues published a few of their findings.

"If somebody is capable of reading Russian, you would find information in scientific journals on how to develop some of these techniques," he said.

Ignorance of Russian may not even be a hindrance.

Last year, two Australian researchers published a paper detailing how they accidentally engineered a superpotent mousepox, a close cousin of smallpox. They said they published their accident to warn that the same techniques could harm humans by strengthening the virulence of smallpox.

Years earlier, researcher Willem Stemmer published news of his creation: an E. coli strain 32,000 times more resistant than conventional bugs.

Of course, genetically engineered "superbugs" aren't the only threat. Mr. Baker, for one, is more concerned about things found in nature, like anthrax, that can be made into biological weapons.

Another setback for biological-warfare defense is the easy availability of declassified documents from the decades-old U.S. germ-warfare program, which was discontinued in 1969. The government has been re-evaluating public access to such documents.

Even before the attacks, the government was funding research to combat potential misuse of biotechnology in biological warfare.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide