- The Washington Times - Sunday, January 27, 2002

GIBRALTAR After nearly three centuries under British rule, the Rock of Gibraltar a synonym for dependability and a symbol of invincibility for the erstwhile British empire is tipping back into Spanish hands, to the alarm of many of its residents.
The Spanish and British governments have revived negotiations after 13 years of deadlock on the future of Europe's only colony and pledged to reach an agreement by summer, which many people expect to lead to decolonization.
That would fulfill a long-held Spanish dream and rid Britain of an issue that has bedeviled relations with Spain since the War of the Spanish Succession in the early 1700s.
It would also be a boon for Europeans. Gibraltar has often been an obstacle to cooperation within the 15-nation European Union, recently holding up a deal on a unified air traffic control system designed to reduce delays for millions of travelers.
But it is the last thing Gibraltarians want. The views of the nearly 30,000 inhabitants of the cramped sliver of land surrounding the Rock have barely budged since a 1967 referendum when all but 44 of the 12,182 ballots cast were against returning to Spanish rule.
"We are quite happy to stay as we are," said dentist George Earl, grimacing as he sat in a long queue of cars waiting to cross the border.
The line is backed up so far on the isthmus that it spills over the airport runway and traffic has to be stopped every time a plane lands. At the border crossing, a Spanish guard leisurely checks passports while chatting with a colleague.
Spanish officials say they restrict the frontier because Britain hasn't scrapped EU passport controls; they also contend the colony is a center of money laundering and contraband smuggling.
Gibraltarians claim the border snarls along with Spanish-led international sports boycotts are meant to demoralize them so they'll accept Spanish rule.
"They're not going to get anywhere with this," Mr. Earl shouted as frustrated drivers honked their horns.
Measuring a mere 2.5 square miles, Gibraltar is only about 11 times the size of the Mall in Washington.
One of the mythological "Pillars of Hercules" flanking the strait where Europe and Africa nearly touch, the 1,396-foot-high limestone promontory commands the entrance to the Mediterranean, which made it a key base when Britain's Royal Navy ruled the seas. But the long range of modern weapons and the changing world situation lessened its importance, and Britain's military left years ago.
The name Gibraltar is thought to be a corruption of Jebel al-Tariq, or Mount Tariq, after the eighth-century conquerer of the Iberian Peninsula.
In 1704, an Anglo-Dutch army led by British Adm. George Rooke captured Gibraltar from the Spaniards, with orders to put it under the domain of Charles III, the Hapsburg claimant to the Spanish throne.
But under the 1713 Treaty of Utrecht, Charles' Bourbon rival, Philip V, ceded the territory to Britain in exchange for recognition as Spain's monarch. The pact included the condition that if Britain ever rid itself of Gibraltar, preference "shall always be given to the Crown of Spain before any others."
Periodic Spanish attempts, or threats, to recover Gibraltar by force continued until the Spanish dictator Gen. Francisco Franco sealed the border in 1969 in an attempt to coerce the colony's return by isolating it economically.
Such persistence is rooted in Gibraltar's negative symbolism in Spanish culture, as opposed to the positive connotation in the English-speaking world that made the Rock a commercial emblem for the Prudential Insurance Co.
Historian Charles Powell, the son of a Spanish mother and English father who lives in Madrid, says Gibraltar reminds Spaniards of the beginning of their imperial decline at the hands of Britain.
"England is the perfidious Albion, the Protestant enemy, the Anglo-Saxon enemy, the 'Anti-Spain' in the Spanish tradition," Mr. Powell said. "To have the Anti-Spain occupying a piece of Spanish territory is the ultimate insult."
In previous talks, Spain refused to discuss anything but regaining full sovereignty, viewing the Utrecht treaty as ruling out self-determination for Gibraltarians.
The Foreign Office in London (on the Internet at https://www.fco.gov.uk) still insists that any change in sovereignty should be approved by the people of Gibraltar.
However, Spain's El Pais newspaper reported Jan. 11 that negotiators are secretly discussing a deal in which London would relinquish that demand in exchange for Madrid accepting joint administration for an indefinite period.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide