- The Washington Times - Friday, January 4, 2002

In a fit of what may be called Ivy Pique, three prized professors from Harvard's Afro-American studies department spent their Christmas holidays very publicly mulling a possible mass exodus in a definite mass huff from dear old Harvard to dear, almost-as-old Princeton. Why? Harvard's new president, Lawrence H. Summers, it seems, needed a quick course in political correction.
Not that anyone involved said so or much of anything else on the record. Anonymous surrogates kept whispering to the press in Boston and New York, but Mr. Summers wouldn't discuss conversations with faculty members; black studies Chairman Henry Louis Gates Jr. wouldn't discuss complaints from department members; black studies professor K. Anthony Appiah wouldn't discuss meetings with Princeton officials; and Cornel West, another black studies professor who recently made a few choice headlines by declaring that America had been "niggerized by the terrorist attacks," wouldn't discuss anything not his rap CD recorded while on medical leave, not his role in Al Sharpton's presidential exploratory committee, not Harvard's endemic grade inflation, nothing. And certainly not what the New York Times called the "critical moment" in this contretemps Mr. West's private meeting with Mr. Summers in October at which such sore subjects were reportedly raised, leaving Mr. West feeling "violated." Or so said the Rev. Jesse Jackson.
Jesse Jackson? How did he get into this? The short answer is that the good reverend flew in, descending on Cambridge on New Year's Day to push for a "national conference on racial justice" (natch) and to seek "clarity" on Harvard's "diversity policy." This policy creed, really is the source of the controversy. As it happens, Harvard's new president of six months has nothing but unqualified support for "diversity," that semantically slippery term for the goals of affirmative action. (According to Harvard's admissions office, the university has never, ever practiced affirmative action.) The question being asked of Mr. Summers was whether his commitment to "diversity" was unqualified enough.
Meanwhile, not to be out-raced, the Rev. Al Sharpton made his own public pitch for "clarification." Al Sharpton suddenly wanted to know whether Harvard had "rebuked" Cornel West he who claims, according to his own words, an "intellectual lineage … through Schopenhauer, Tolstoy, Rilke, Melville, Lorca, Kafka, Celan, Beckett, Soyinka, O'Neill, Kazantzakis, Morrison, and above all, Chekhov" for joining Mr. Sharpton's proto-presidential campaign. If so, Mr. Sharpton told the Boston Globe, this could not only keep professors across the nation from supporting his candidacy for fear of repercussions, but it could also drive Mr. Sharpton to file suit against Harvard as an "aggrieved party."
It's enough to make you pity a poor Harvard president, almost. How could this have happened? Mr. Summers, not one to see college applicants through color-blind glasses, supports "diversity" and says so or his spokesman does at every opportunity. This, apparently, has been insufficient. "It's absolutely critical that the president make an unequivocal public statement in support of affirmative action. That would be encouraging for those scholars … recruited because this was going to be the premier institution of black intellectual inquiry," said Charles J. Ogletree Jr., a Harvard Law School professor best known for leading the legal effort to extract reparations for slavery, to the New York Times. (Oops: Since Harvard says it doesn't practice affirmative action, didn't the law prof mean to call for a presidential statement supporting "diversity"?) Mr. Ogletree, magnanimous thing, has since signalled a willingness to work with Mr. Summers to "make Harvard a pre-eminent university."
Maybe that won't be necessary. Mr. Summers has decided to begin the year right at least, more correctly by publicly restating his diversity creed. In a written statement, Mr. Summers announced his intentions "to create an ever more open and inclusive environment," by drawing on "the widest possible range of talents" to promote "ever greater opportunity for all" because "diversity contributes to educational excellence." (Mr. Summers also took the opportunity to underscore Harvard's desire "to see the current [Afro-Am] faculty stay at Harvard," promising to "compete vigorously" ka-ching, ka-ching? "to make this an attractive environment.")
Looks like he finally made the grade. The statement "meets the objectives that many people had set forth," Mr. Ogletree told the Harvard Crimson. "It's strong, it's clear, it's unequivocal." Even Mr. Jackson called Mr. Summers' statement "positive," while Mr. Appiah now says his Princeton visit was purely social. No word as yet from Messrs. Gates, West and Sharpton, but it does look as if Harvard is heading for, if not a happy ending, at least an ending.
Not so fast. According to yesterday's Boston Globe, there's trouble ahead: "Now, echoing some top scholars in Harvard's Afro-American studies department, many Latino professors are questioning Summers' commitment to diversity, and some say they are considering jobs at other universities…" (Italics added.)
Can't wait to hear what Harvard has to say about that.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide