- The Washington Times - Wednesday, July 24, 2002

ASSOCIATED PRESS

The House signed off yesterday on a compromise $28.9 billion anti-terrorism package, capping a four-month fight that saw lawmakers heed President Bush's demands to limit the bill's cost.

Half the measure's money was for the stepped-up battle against terrorism that the Pentagon and intelligence agencies have waged since the September 11 attacks.

Other recipients included New York's rebuilding efforts, federal aviation safety programs, local emergency agencies, allies like Afghanistan and the Philippines and a slew of home-district projects won by lawmakers.

"This is a victory for the president and for taxpayers," White House budget office spokesman Trent Duffy said of the vote. "Congress met the president's demands to do what's necessary without going overboard."

The House approved the measure by 397-32 after only an hour of debate. Senate passage is expected today. The money is for the rest of the federal budget year, which ends Sept. 30.

"This bill is critical to winning the war on terrorism," said Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham, California Republican.

The bill's contents were widely popular, but Bush's request last March for a $27.1 billion version of the measure ignited an election-year battle over its proper size.

The Democratic-run Senate's bill reached $31.5 billion, but with huge budget deficits on a comeback, White House officials threatened to veto anything exceeding the Republican-run House's near $29 billion cost.

For a while, Democrats used Mr. Bush's demands for lower spending to question his seriousness about shoring up domestic security. Even many Republicans wanted more money than Mr. Bush, and White House budget chief Mitchell Daniels bore the wrath of lawmakers from both parties over his insistence that his bottom-line figure not be surpassed.

But with the federal fiscal year nearing its end amid administration complaints that the Pentagon and Transportation Security Administration were scrounging for dollars, party leaders were unwilling to wage a veto fight against a popular president.

"We simply need to get on with it, and we need to get this down to the president," said Rep. David R. Obey of Wisconsin, one of the leading Democratic authors of the package.

By the time the House-Senate compromise was written, lawmakers had larded it with items for the voters back home.

Such projects included $6 million to upgrade a U.S. Geological Survey data center near Sioux Falls, S.D.; $10 million to help farmers near the Rio Grande River involved in a water dispute with Mexico; $7 million for enhancing water supplies in New Mexico; and a provision pressuring the Agriculture Department to reimburse poultry producers in West Virginia and Virginia for losses from avian influenza.

The bill's major categories included $14.5 billion for defense and intelligence; $6.7 billion for aviation safety, the FBI and other domestic security programs; $5.5 billion for New York; and $2.1 billion for foreign aid and U.S. diplomatic programs.

Also approved were funds having little to do with the fight against terror. These included $1 billion for Pell grants for low-income students; $417 million for veterans' medical care; $400 million to help states improve voting systems; $205 million to bail out Amtrak; $200 million for fighting AIDS and other diseases abroad; and $100 million for countering Western wildfires and floods.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide