- The Washington Times - Monday, June 10, 2002

The vaunted reorganization of the FBI is actually, in dangerous essence, a return to J. Edgar Hoover's COINTELPRO counterintelligence operation from 1956 to 1971. Attorney General John Ashcroft and FBI Director Robert Mueller are again unleashing the FBI to infiltrate, monitor and target lawful organizations and their members, or visitors with no current or planned evidence of illegal activity.
COINTELPRO was closed down because of unbridled FBI abuses of the First and Fourth amendments, along with other parts of the Constitution. "The American people need to be reassured that never again will an agency of the government be permitted to conduct a secret war against those citizens it considered threats," pledged then-Sen. Frank Church of Idaho chairman of the Senate Select Committee to investigate the FBI's violations of fundamental American liberties in 1975.
Because of the abuses of COINTELPRO, guidelines were set which have now been dismissed by the attorney general requiring that FBI agents could not investigate gatherings in church or other meetings without some evidence that someone there may have done, or planned to do, something illegal.
The newly reorganized FBI can now send its disguised agents into religious institutions, libraries and meetings of citizens critical of government policies without a previous complaint, or reason to believe, that a crime has been, or is about to be, committed.
As Laura Murphy, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Washington office says: "The FBI is now telling the American people, 'You no longer have to do anything unlawful in order to get that knock on the door.' "
However, Mr. Ashcroft claims that FBI agents can now go into any public place "under the same terms and conditions of any member of the public." But the rest of us, while not expecting privacy in a public place, do not expect to be spied on; or to be put in a FBI database because of what other people said at a meeting or what we say. We do not expect the amiable person next to us to be a secret agent of the government.
"Without the [post-COINTELPRO] guidelines, law enforcement authorities could conduct investigations that had a chilling effect on entirely appropriate lawful expression of political beliefs, the free exercise of religion, and the freedom of assembly," said former U.S. Attorney Zachary Carter, best known for diligently prosecuting the Abner Louima case, in a May 31 piece published in the New York Times.
Now the FBI can do it again.
It is very much worth noting that Mr. Ashcroft, acting unilaterally in bringing back COINTELPRO, did not inform Congress of it. Whether many members of Congress will investigate this breach of the Bill of Rights is doubtful because, with elections coming up, most may be afraid of being labeled unpatriotic by their opponents. And President George W. Bush, chronically tone deaf to civil liberties, enthusiastically approves going back to the climate established by J. Edgar Hoover.
But for congressional leaders whose commitment to protecting the Constitution is not limited to a speech on the Fourth of July, I urge their reflection on something else Sen. Church said in August 1975, when he warned that the American intelligence capabilities focusing on potential enemies could, "at any time," be turned around on the American people, and no American would have any privacy left. There would be no place to hide. And this was before the radical expansion of government electronic surveillance capabilities by the FBI.
"The Justice Department has gone too far," says Rep. James Sensenbrenner Jr., a firmly conservative Republican of Wisconsin and chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. We can have security, he adds, "without throwing respect for civil liberties into the trash heap. We don't have to go back to the bad old days when the FBI was spying on people like Martin Luther King."
As if to justify Mr. Sensebrenner's fears, Mr. Ashcroft argues on the June 2 edition of ABC-TV's "This Week" that "We shouldn't have to have leads or preliminary investigations" to send covert FBI agents into public meetings, churches, mosques and the like. That's what J. Edgar Hoover fervently believed, and that's what the FBI can do again now.
Asked on CNN whether the FBI no longer needs leads or evidence to spy on us, Republican Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchinson of Texas responded blithely, "There will be probable cause, some kind of evidence."
This is congressional oversight of the "new" FBI?
And FBI Director Robert Mueller, asked on NBC's "Meet The Press" if we'll have to give up our civil liberties, said, without hesitation, "I don't believe so. I don't believe so at all."
J. Edgar Hoover, with the American flag in the background, used to say the same thing.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide