- The Washington Times - Friday, June 21, 2002

Uh, Jack Kemp?

Makers of the popular board game Trivial Pursuit write to say: "Congratulations! The Washington Times has been immortalized in the 20th Anniversary edition of Trivial Pursuit, which hits store shelves this month. The question appears in the news category:

"'Q: What former NFL quarterback did George W. Bush consider naming secretary of the Navy, according to The Washington Times?'

"'A: Roger Staubach.'"


Grounds for heroes

Among other points, Texas Sen. Phil Gramm insists he's not fat and says he's too old to be intimidated.

"When I objected to that bill going forward, Mr. [Jan] Scruggs made a lot of personal comments about me, attacking me as 'fat.' Actually, I'm not that fat," the Texas Republican informed Inside the Beltway yesterday.

That was the same day we wrote about Mr. Gramm's chance encounter this week at New York's LaGuardia Airport with Mr. Scruggs, founder of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial.

Ironically, we reported, Mr. Scruggs had been in the Big Apple trying to persuade NBC News anchor Tom Brokaw to investigate Mr. Gramm's legislative maneuvering over the past 18 months to prevent a Vietnam Veterans Education Center from being built at the widely visited memorial, also known as "the Wall."

As Mr. Scruggs tells the story, he introduced himself to Mr. Gramm as the two walked down the jetway to their airplane, in doing so acknowledging "the long struggle" against the senator over the education center.

"Is it over or not, Senator? I need to know," Mr. Scruggs said he asked Mr. Gramm, who reportedly then replied: "As far as I am concerned, it never happened."

But yesterday Mr. Gramm painted a different version. He says Mr. Scruggs apologized to him during the short stroll to the airplane, saying "he hoped I didn't hold a grudge for what he had said about me, and that is when I responded that as far as I was concerned, it never happened."

In other words, Mr. Gramm says: "I was accepting his apology for his [earlier] bad manners."

As for the Vietnam Education Center?

"I have no intention of letting a bill pass that precludes the building of another memorial at the Mall," Mr. Gramm tells Inside the Beltway. "Currently, we are considering a memorial to [Dwight D.] Eisenhower and one to Ronald Reagan, and there is no possibility that I am going to let a bill go forward that would allow no more memorials."

The Texas lawmaker, who retires at the end of his term in January, stresses that he's not opposed to the education center. However, he vows to continue to stop its legislation until language provisions are removed "that would prohibit memorials to Eisenhower or Reagan or any other future hero and I hope we have some and I'm confident we will."


Go figure

President Bush has given the go-ahead for covert U.S. operatives to overthrow, if not pull the trigger on, Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein.

In the meantime, Sen. Frank H. Murkowski points out, the U.S. every day continues importing more than 1 million barrels of Iraqi oil to fill American's gas tanks. Last year alone, says the Alaska Republican, the U.S. spent more than $4 billion to purchase Iraqi oil.

As the ranking member of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee puts it: "We need solutions to better align our national-security policies with our energy policies."


Finders keepers?

Don't everybody look now, but $17 billion has been misplaced by Uncle Sam.

Treasury Secretary Paul H. O'Neill has just received a letter from Rep. Walter B. Jones Jr., North Carolina Republican, asking him to account for $17.3 billion in "unreconciled transactions," as revealed in the 2001 Financial Report of the United States Government.

What can $17 billion buy in these times of war?

As Mr. Jones calculates it: two aircraft carriers and two full air wings, with pocket change.


Extra butter, please

The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), an activist group that wants taxes on snack foods and soft drinks, dubbed fettuccini Alfredo a "heart attack on a plate," and trashed Chinese food, popcorn, pizza and other popular dishes, may have a sense of humor after all.

"Or maybe CSPI is just too accurate for its own good," says Mike Burita of the Center for Consumer Freedom.

"The nation's top nanny group now wants us to call it NANA," he observes. "Whether you read that as another name for Nanny, a step away from CSPI shaking its finger and saying 'no no' to your favorite foods, or activists thumbing their nose at consumer freedom with a juvenile 'nyah nyah,' it all amounts to the latest condescending attack on your intelligence."

NANA actually is the acronym for its new moniker the National Alliance for Nutrition and Activity.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide