- The Washington Times - Friday, March 22, 2002

From combined dispatches
Workers saving for retirement could be encouraged, possibly even required, to diversify investments in their company 401(k) accounts when Congress finishes writing new pension laws aimed at avoiding the big losses Enron employees suffered.
Diversification is at the crux of the debate between Democrats and Republicans over how best to protect workers' investments, and sharply different proposals are emerging.
Hundreds of Enron employees, whose 401(k) plans were invested heavily in company stock, lost their retirement savings last year when the value plummeted. Overall, the 20,795 participants in Enron's 401(k) plan had about 63 percent of their assets invested in company stock at the end of 2000.
About 42 million Americans hold 401(k) accounts, with $2 trillion in assets.
Democrats have stopped short of capping how much company stock a worker can have in a 401(k) plan. But a Senate bill narrowly approved yesterday by the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee does limit the stock by requiring a choice: An employer that offers a 401(k) plan could make matching contributions in company stock or offer the stock as an investment option, but not both.
Companies could offer both options if they provide workers with a traditional pension plan.
"If this bill had been the law of the land, Enron employees would not have lost their retirement savings," said Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat, committee chairman and bill sponsor. "Our bill will protect America's workers and prevent future Enrons."
Labor law limits to 10 percent the assets of a traditional pension plan that can be held in employer stock or property. Years ago, Congress exempted 401(k)s from that provision, hoping to encourage employers to offer the plans. Employers get tax breaks for matching contributions made in company stock.
At many large corporations, 401(k) plans are invested heavily in company stock despite the opportunity for other choices. The percentage of McDonald's retirement savings held in company stock is 74 percent. Pharmaceutical giant Pfizer's figure is more than 86 percent. And at Procter & Gamble, the rate is almost 95 percent.
Republicans oppose the Senate bill because they say it will prompt companies to stop matching contributions or cease offering 401(k) plans altogether. They also say workers should decide how they want to invest without government interference and be given the opportunity to create wealth.
"It's a cap. It limits choice of employees, and that's not what we should be about," said Sen. Tim Hutchinson, Arkansas Republican.
Most investment advisers recommend that only 5 percent of workers' retirement funds be locked up in company stock.
Critics of 401(k) plans composed primarily of company stock say that even a small downturn in stock prices can spell big trouble. Last year, Verizon Communications' stock fell 5 percent. That translated into a loss of $250 million in Verizon's retirement fund.
Two bills that will be merged into the Republican-led House's pension reform plan do not mandate diversification and instead encourage investment education. They closely resemble a proposal offered by President Bush.
Mr. Bush has said he wants workers to have greater flexibility to diversify their company-sponsored 401(k) plans, but he opposes limits on investment choice.
His proposal would let workers sell employer-matched company stock after they have participated in a plan for three years. Some companies require workers to hold such stock until they reach age 50. It also would let workers receive financial advice from the same companies that manage their 401(k) accounts.
Mr. Kennedy's bill also imposes the three-year participation provision to sell company stock, but requires that investment advice be independent and impartial.
Republicans say investment education is the best way to promote diversification, which could help protect investors from another Enron. Amy Vernier contributed to this report.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide