- The Washington Times - Tuesday, March 26, 2002

Class-action lawsuits seeking billions of dollars from tobacco companies have been filed in 11 states and contend that cigarette-makers use terms like "light" to mislead smokers into believing those brands are safer.
The same argument helped survivors of a 53-year-old Oregon woman who died from lung cancer win a jury award of $150 million from Philip Morris Cos. last week.
The class-action lawsuits name the nation's three largest tobacco companies Philip Morris, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. and Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. and claim violations of consumer protection laws.
"It's a scam, because they get people to believe that they reduce health risks when that is a false statement," said Stephen Sheller, a lawyer in Philadelphia who began preparing the cases four years ago.
Tobacco companies say the lawsuits have no merit. R.J. Reynolds spokesman Seth Moskowitz said cigarette manufacturers use terms like "full-flavor," "lights" and "ultra lights" to differentiate strength of taste and the amount of tar and nicotine.
"These terms do not, and are not meant to, imply that any cigarette brand style or any category of cigarettes is safer than any other," he said.
The Oregon jury said Philip Morris falsely represented low-tar cigarettes as more healthful. It was the first such verdict in the nation.
The Federal Trade Commission, which has some regulatory authority over the marketing and advertising of cigarettes, does not define "light." The tobacco industry generally uses that term to describe cigarettes with less than 15 milligrams of tar, a carcinogen produced when tobacco is burned. Tar helps deliver nicotine to smokers.
The effort to market low-tar cigarettes gained momentum in the 1960s, after some health advocates said they could reduce health risks, including cancer.
Former U.S. Surgeon General Julius Richmond recommended in 1981 that smokers switch to lights if they couldn't quit. That position has since been dropped, but sales of light cigarettes have boomed. They account for the majority of the U.S. cigarette market.
While more people were turning to light cigarettes, the American Cancer Society was conducting studies the first in the 1960s and the second in the 1980s that found lung cancer death rates among smokers rose even though tar levels had dropped.
A National Cancer Institute study in the fall offered an explanation. It found that cigarettes that yielded low tar and nicotine when tested on government-approved machines gave off higher levels when smoked by people.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide