- The Washington Times - Wednesday, May 8, 2002

Politically liberal and religiously secular people are having too good a time beating up on the Roman Catholic Church.

Lefties, who would never tolerate stereotyping their favorite groups (blacks, women and gays come to mind as examples), think nothing of universally condemning all things Catholic for the despicable sexual actions of what appears to be a relatively small number of priests and the coverup by some higher-ups in the church.

I happen to love Catholics as well as Jews, though I confess not to love all Catholics, or all Jews (or all Protestants, or all atheists, for that matter). But among those of whom I am not particularly fond, I'm not unfond of them because of they are Jewish or Catholic. There are unique personality and behavioral traits that contribute to my view of them, and the same is probably true of them when they think of me.

Media commentators are among the worst offenders. Not since the "high-tech lynching" of Clarence Thomas and the scandals involving certain TV evangelists have they enjoyed themselves this much. They get the added benefit of covering themselves in faux righteousness, pretending to care about the health and welfare of a church in which most have little or no part, while simultaneously and hypocritically giving it a public flogging.

One such commentator is Bill Keller of the New York Times. In his May 4 column, Mr. Keller admits, "I am what a friend calls a 'collapsed Catholic' well beyond lapsed and therefore claim no voice in whom the church ordains or how it prays or what it chooses to call a sin." Such a confession doesn't stop Mr. Keller, however, from giving what might be called "collapsed advice." According to Mr. Keller, who echoes other critics, the Catholic Church's problem is that it is not modern and refuses to take marching orders from the likes of people such as himself.

The "gospel" according to Mr. Keller and his fellow collapsees is that the Catholic Church and by implication all religion must conduct the ultimate makeover and adapt to this present age. Ozzy Osbourne might fit Mr. Keller's ideal of a popular "pope," since the chief contribution of Mr. Osbourne and his family appears to be providing distractions and entertainment for the damned. Modernization, to Mr. Keller, seems to mean no prohibition against anything the spiritually collapsed want to do, including abortion and sexual activity of all kinds between consenting adults.

As Dr. Charles Stanley, senior pastor of First Baptist Church, Atlanta, once observed in a sermon: "We have come a long way from little Samuel, who said, 'Speak, Lord, for thy servant heareth,' to our present moment when we say, 'Listen, Lord, for thy servant speaketh.' "

The arrest last week of the Rev. Paul Shanley on charges of raping young boys while he was a Boston priest is one example of the media piling-on.

William Donohue, president of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, believes the media have not given a full picture of the Shanley case. The priest's allegedly abusive behavior was, in fact, the result of his defying church teachings on sexual matters, Mr. Donahue notes.

Father Shanley, writes Mr. Donohue in a May 3 Catholic League news release, "got the green light [in 1970] from Cardinal Humberto Medeiros," then the archbishop of Boston, who appointed Father Shanley as his "representative for sexual minorities." Not only was this a "bizarre ministry," notes Mr. Donohue, but Father Shanley was openly gay which, in itself, defied church teachings on sexuality. In 1979, Cardinal Medeiros ended Father Shanley's "special ministry." Father Shanley then denounced Cardinal Medeiros because the cardinal had admonished homosexuals to abstain from sex, which Father Shanley branded as "virtually useless advice."

Critics inside and outside the Catholic Church are right to call for an investigation of the coverup of sexual crimes by priests and for new rules governing behavior and accountability. But the media should be ashamed that they are using the horror of adult-child sexual abuse, and even sex between consenting adults, as a flimsy excuse to wallow in unrestrained bigotry. If anyone needs to "modernize," it's the bigots.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide