- The Washington Times - Monday, November 11, 2002

Democrats are still sorting through what happened in last week's elections. That's simple: What happened is that American politics continued its inexorable, post-Reagan movement to the right.
Republicans strengthened their hold on the House, regained control of the Senate, and though they lost some long-held Republican governorships partially offset their losses with some improbable gains elsewhere.
More important than what the GOP won is the agenda they ran on. This was something TV news anchors apparently failed to fully grasp last Tuesday night. They focused on the politicians but not on what they were selling and what the voters were buying.
Democratic National Committee Chairman Terry McAuliffe remained mired in denial last week, saying GOP victories were due entirely to President Bush's popularity and the tens of millions he raised for his party, but "not to ideology."
Undeniably, Mr. Bush's gutsy, high-risk strategy to campaign all out in the midterm elections was a pivotal factor in the Nov. 5 outcomes. But Mr. Bush believes in some fundamental things, like lower tax rates. And part of the story of Tuesday's elections was that many of the candidates who won were retailing what Mr. Bush believes in.
In fact, despite Mr. McAuliffe's spin, voters were very focused on policies driven by ideology. In many cases they chose candidates who ran on making Mr. Bush's tax cuts permanent, holding the line on future taxes and even eliminating some taxes altogether.
In Minnesota, hardly a hotbed of right wing ideology, Republican Norm Coleman stoutly defended Bush tax cuts and said he would vote to make them permanent. He even suggested that deeper tax cuts were needed to stimulate long-term growth and investment.
Mr. Coleman, a charismatic former mayor of St. Paul who is an up-and-coming Republican star, not only beat Walter Mondale convincingly, but showed his party how to blunt the Democrats' scare tactics on Social Security.
The Democrats pounded him throughout the summer on Mr. Bush's Social Security reform plan, saying the idea of personal investment accounts would lead to benefit cuts, and worse. Contrary to cooked media stories that Republicans were running away from Mr. Bush's plan, Mr. Coleman defended letting younger workers put part of their payroll taxes in stocks or bonds.
The unreported story in this Senate race and in many others is that the Democrats' scare tactics failed. I talked to several retirees at Coleman rallies who said the Democrats' fearmongering was reprehensible.
In two other Senate contests against Democratic incumbents, Jim Talent in Missouri and Saxby Chambliss in Georgia ran on maintaining the Bush tax cuts and won. Both even suggested the tax cuts needed to be accelerated and have called for cutting or abolishing other taxes like the capital-gains rate.
In the Minnesota governor's race, Republican Tim Pawlenty ran and won handily on his pledge never to raise taxes in his term. Facing a huge deficit, he said he would balance the budget through spending cuts, layoffs and increased economic growth.
Certainly the Democrats had bragging rights for their big gubernatorial gains in Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. But those victories were partly offset by Republican gains in Democratic-held states that included Alaska, Georgia, Hawaii, Maryland, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Vermont and, of course, Minnesota.
The GOP won these and other governorships on very conservative issues like drilling for oil in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Reserve, no state income tax in New Hampshire, and getting tougher on spending and crime in Maryland where Bob Ehrlich became the first Republican governor in 34 years.
In South Carolina, Republican Mark Sanford defeated Democratic Gov. Jim Hodges by promoting school-choice vouchers and getting rid of the state income tax.
If you think America's politics isn't changing, look at the unlikely places where the GOP won governorships last week: Businessman Donald Carcieri in Rhode Island, Mitt Romney in Massachusetts and Sonny Perdue in Georgia where a Republican has not been governor since 1872.
Even in the two Senate contests that the Democrats won, they took Republican-lite positions on key issues. South Dakota Sen. Tim Johnson eked out a victory by voting for Mr. Bush's tax cuts and supporting him on the war resolution. In Arkansas, Mark Pryor was no Bush-basher.
In the months to come, Democrats are going to have to do some deep soul-searching to figure out how to adapt to the nation's increasing conservatism or they will risk becoming irrelevant in American politics.
In the expanding age of the investor class, Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle's class warfare politics and his hatred for tax cuts is hurting his party and his country.
The Democrats need a new leader who understands the aspirations of upwardly mobile, middle-class voters who think there is nothing wrong with being rich someone like John F. Kennedy who led his party back to the White House in 1960 by calling for tax cuts to get the U.S. economy "moving again." Are there any takers?

Donald Lambro, chief political correspondent for The Washington Times, is a nationally syndicated columnist.

LOAD COMMENTS ()

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide