- The Washington Times - Sunday, November 17, 2002

"No one gets a royal flush in life," our son said at the age of about 12 when something he had dreamed about did not materialize a first sign of common sense?

But President George W. Bush got one earlier this month. Sweeping the off-year elections and bending the mighty Security Council to his will was something his adversaries will scratch their heads over for a long time.

Not only his adversaries: Republican multitudes have had upset stomachs about the apparent concession of his every agenda point for the sake of, or so we were led to believe, electoral victory.

To be honest, the name Karl Rove credited with the "votes are everything" approach was on many lips, often accompanied with sighs of "Brother, I sure hope he knows what he's doin'."

The votes are in and, yes, he knew what he was doing. A final resolution to be laid before the Security Council was prepared well in advance, for it hit minutes after the election results had been confirmed. Similarly, minutes after the 15-0 vote of the council, the president was ready to furnish Iraq with the first formal ultimatum.

It was nice to hear the United States issue an ultimatum instead of sponsoring sensitivity training for the spotted hyena.

It was nice to see the Security Council whip their right arms skyward, as if spring-loaded, even before one heard what the question was going to be. And if you thought they had a change of heart on intellectual, moral or ethical grounds, I have some seafront property in Indiana I could sell you. They heard the American people and weighed the consequences.

So now, two questions. Are all of us doubting Thomases willing to eat humble pie? And was that remarkable victory worth going along with Sen. Edward Kennedy's educational hallucinations, Sen. John McCain's campaign finance disease, or the continuing lack of border controls?

As for the first, credit ought to be given where credit is due. With regard to the second, only the future will tell. Too often have we hung our heads observing that Republican majorities tended to be less effective than Democratic minorities.

But now the president holds a full house. There are those with visions of tax cuts becoming permanent. Or those who busily assemble rosters of potential judges and justices, worthy of the title. Some pray for a restoration of United States citizenship with dignity and meaning.

Given my lifelong participation in education, let me dream my own dream.

We have had one "education president" after another. We have heard pledges about dismantling the Department of Education. The reality has been that 12 years of studying language, grammar, math, history and sciences in our grade schools has been replaced with round-the-clock "sensitivity training" and America-bashing. The question is not whether we leave any child behind, but whether we will end up a nation that has lost its ability to reason. We are on the way.

Europeans always were ahead in discussions about fine art, great literature, serious music. But Americans carried the day with a gargantuan common sense that allowed for freedom of action, and guaranteed successful action.

So here is my dream.

Now that President Bush has tasted the tonic of issuing an ultimatum to counter a foreign threat, why not try his hand at a domestic one? Without the slightest intention to exaggerate, I propose that the state of our schools is as certain to bring about the downfall of this nation as all the weapons of mass destruction Saddam Hussein may harbor.

How about an ultimatum to our educational establishment, reading thus:

"As its last act of unconstitutionally interfering with education, the United States government will cut off all federal funding without further notice from any and all schools in which, (a) less than 90 percent of instruction time is devoted to the dissemination of knowledge, as understood by generations of Americans before 1968; (b) individual achievement is evaluated through the lens of "sociological" factors; (c) failure is excused as someone else's fault; (d) the ancestors of some students are constantly blamed for something that happened or didn't happen to the ancestors of other students; (e) no distinction is made between right and wrong; (f) the staff fails to explain about the United States that no nation has sacrificed as much for the good of others, and that its immense power has never threatened anyone but the rogue, the insidious, the evil."

I know. It's just a dream.


Balint Vazsonyi, concert pianist and senior fellow of the Potomac Foundation, is a nationally syndicated columnist.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide