- The Washington Times - Saturday, November 30, 2002

PHILADELPHIA It was supposed to be an important moment in American Judaism.
Jewish leaders from around the country had booked themselves into a posh hotel near Philadelphia's historic district for the week before Hanukkah, expecting to hear results of a $6 million, multiyear study of U.S. Jews.
The findings could be critical, shaping how tens of millions of dollars will be spent to keep Judaism alive in the United States at a time when many Jews are marrying outside the faith.
Then, just before its release, the report was withheld.
The survey's technical advisers now are in a bitter public fight with the nonprofit agency directing the project, and critics are wondering if the group is trying to bury bad news.
The agency, United Jewish Communities, insists its National Jewish Population Survey is on track and will be made public though it won't say when.
"There's no smoking gun here," said Stephen Hoffman, the agency president. "Based upon what I've been told, the study is fundamentally sound."
But some say the delay has undermined the credibility of the report even before it's out.
"They've inflicted a major blow to themselves," said Egon Mayer, academic director of the North American Jewish Data Bank and a technical adviser for the study. "It boggles my mind."
The survey tracks key trends including intermarriage, links to Israel and observances of religious rituals. The report is perhaps best known for its 1990 finding that 52 percent of Jews marry non-Jews.
The 2000 study originally was supposed to be released more than a year ago, but researchers said it was hard to find people willing to participate. The date was pushed back and speculation grew that the survey was in trouble.
Some preliminary results were released last month, including a finding that the U.S. Jewish population had dropped over the last decade, from 5.5 million to 5.2 million.
Then, a week before the United Jewish Communities General Assembly and announcement of the remaining results, an angry Mr. Hoffman said he had learned that "critical data" had been lost and he was postponing the release until he could assess the damage.
He said the information apparently had gone missing two years ago in the offices of Roper ASW, the firm that conducted the field work, but Mr. Hoffman had only just been told.
Vivian Klaff, one of the top technical advisers, accused Mr. Hoffman of overreacting and insisted the data was not critical.
Mr. Klaff said the missing information was coded material that had been collected to see if someone qualified to participate in the survey. Just a portion of that data was gone and adjustments could be made to compensate for the loss, he said. The respondents' answers to questions remain intact.
Mr. Klaff said he sent Mr. Hoffman a letter saying "please don't do this," and asking him to release the report on schedule. But Mr. Hoffman said he had lost confidence in the leadership of the technical team. He has appointed a task force to investigate.
Roper ASW won't discuss the mishap, but the battle between Mr. Hoffman and his advisers and the last-minute delay raised suspicions at the assembly last week that the missing data were the least of the study's problems.
"I'm hearing people asking, 'What's really going on?'" said Eva Goldfinger, as she worked a booth for the International Federation for Secular Humanist Jews, which has criticized the survey for too narrowly defining who is a Jew. "Why did they suddenly hold it back? Did they not like the results?"

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide