- The Washington Times - Monday, October 28, 2002

The mainstream media has informed us that Lee Malvo, the reportedly 17-year-old youth held as a material witness in the sniper investigation along with his stepfather John Allen Muhammad, is a "Jamaican national." As of this writing, the Immigration and Naturalization Service has refused to comment publicly on the exact nature of Mr. Malvo's immigration status.
Here are the facts the INS does not want you to know: Lee Malvo is an illegal alien from Jamaica who jumped ship in Miami in June 2001. He was apprehended by the Border Patrol in Bellingham, Wash., in December 2001, but was then let go by the INS district in Seattle in clear violation of federal law and contrary to what the arresting Border Patrol officers intended, according to my law enforcement sources.
According to INS records I obtained, Mr. Malvo was arrested by Border Patrol agents in Bellingham, Wash., on Dec. 19, 2001. Local police called the Border Patrol during an incident involving "some sort of custody dispute" between his mother, Uma Sceon James, and stepfather, John Muhammad (the ex-Army soldier with radical Muslim ties now at the center of the sniper investigation). Mrs. James admitted that six months earlier "she and her son were passengers on a cargo ship that was filled with 'illegal asians (sic).' They were all off loaded in the Miami, Fla., area where she immediately located work at the Red Lobster in Fort Myers, Fla."
From there, Mr. Malvo and Mrs. James traveled to Tacoma, Wash., and ended up in Bellingham. At the time of their arrest, INS records indicate, neither Mr. Malvo nor his mother had any documents proving their identities or allowing them "to be or remain in the United States legally." The Border Patrol agents concluded that because she had "no roots or close family ties in the United States, James was likely to abscond." The arresting officer noted that the mother and son illegal aliens would be "detained at the Seattle detention facility in Seattle, Wash., pending deportation charges."
That's not what happened. About a month after their arrest, Mr. Malvo and his mother were set free by the Seattle district INS contrary to what the arresting Border Patrol officers had determined should be done and in clear violation of federal law regarding the removal of illegal alien stowaways. According to the Detention and Deportation Officers' Field Manual:
"Occasionally, you may encounter an alien who claims to be a stowaway, but cannot or will not provide information concerning the name of the vessel of arrival. Prior to April 1, 1997, such aliens could be handled in the same way as any other EWI [entered without inspection] case and placed into removal proceedings. The [Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act], however, directs that stowaways, regardless of when encountered, are to be removed without a hearing citing section 235(a)(2) of the Act as the authority for the action."
The law is explicit: Illegal alien stowaways are to be detained and deported without hearings. Mrs. James admitted that she and her son were illegal alien stowaways. Yet, in January 2002, Mrs. James was released on a $1,500 bond; Mr. Malvo was set loose without any bond on his own recognizance. Here is my theory: Somebody at the Seattle INS office leaned on the arresting Border Patrol officers to disregard Mr. Malvo and his mother's "stowaway" status allowing them to run free and allowing the INS to avoid the costs associated with detention and deportation.
So, who let Lee Malvo loose? The Seattle INS office referred my call to the Washington headquarters. The national headquarters referred calls to the Montgomery County sniper task force. Standard INS operating procedure: Pass the buck and run for cover.
"This makes me sick to my stomach," says Daryl Schermerhorn, vice president of the Northwest regional chapter of the National Border Patrol Council, which represents Border Patrol agents in Washington State. "The INS is not concerned with enforcing immigration law," he told me. "It's more concerned with freeing up jails and saving a few bucks than it is with protecting Americans and removing people who don't belong here."
As I document in my book, "Invasion," these countless "catch and release" cases have demoralized rank-and-file INS agents and cost scores of American lives from police officers gunned down by fugitive deportees to victims of illegal border-crossing slayers, and now, quite possibly, to the innocents slaughtered in the Washington-area sniping spree.
Eugene Davis, a retired deputy chief Border Patrol agent in Blaine, Wash., told me: "This is another classic example of how our catch-and-release policy for illegal aliens remains a danger to us all. What's it going to take for the American people to demand that we fix the system?"

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide