- The Washington Times - Friday, September 13, 2002

"How long will the image of the burning World Trade Center motivate Americans?" the reporter asked.

It's not simply an image, it's a fact, I replied. The murders, the destruction, the hole that was the World Trade Center, they're facts. They're verifiable. They're in your face.

Credit the reporter for getting at what remains this war's pivotal issue, America's "collective will" to pursue the fight. When a democratic nation wages war, the collective will to sustain the conflict is the strategic key to victory. A failure in will leads to defeat. After September 11, 2001, America's national challenge was to forge the will to sustain the effort required to defeat the terror syndicates despite the inevitable mistakes, setbacks and lost lives.

A year ago, al Qaeda bet that America was a sitcom nation, a creature of Hollywood, with an attention span that had shrunk to the length of an MTV video. That was al Qaeda's image of America: couch potatoes and appeaseniks. Al Qaeda's "image of America" was superficial and ultimately wrong.

That is one reason the reporter's question struck me as video-kid and superficial. It suggested couch potato culture, where pancake make-up and glitz trump substance.

The slaughter of innocents, the sacrifice of New York police and firemen, the terrorists' driving fanaticism, the monstrous evil of it the very human and cosmic substances of the tragedy cannot be fully captured in any mere image. I don't discount the possibility some future Picasso may paint a September 11 "Guernica," but a horse with a spike in its throat won't cut it this time. For many, the truly horrifying pictures are not burning skyscrapers, but those of the men and women who chose to leap 90 floors to their deaths rather than perish by fire. Paint me that horror.

In one way, my reaction to the reporter was unfair. The man was tasked with the tough job of producing a broad September 11 story for one of America's largest dailies. Experienced reporters know the Friday night crime beat's hard enough when it's only Al shooting Hal. Shrinking September 11's mega-event into mere column inches requires art as well as heart.

Still, the tag of "image" suggested a heinous disconnection or even denial of the tragedy, a sad reduction of the tragedies to advertising, or worse, advertising's malign political cousin, propaganda.

The horror of an image an image alone may motivate, but it will not sustain.

What does sustain motivation is the recognition of the terrorist acts' pernicious evil and the continuing threat presented by the evildoers.

All but the most looney-toon appeaseniks at least pay lip service to September 11's evil. A few don't, such as the French hard-left conspiracy theorist who wrote a best seller accusing the U.S. military attacking its own Pentagon. This bouffant of balderdash says a Pentagon parking lot TV clip proves a missile struck the building, not a hijacked airplane.

But lip-service nods at evil are about as far as the appeaseniks will go. Somewhere in the hearts of these Neville Chamberlains lurks the notion that America somehow did deserve to be attacked. They've built entire academic and political careers on the premise of American global malevolence.

The responsible among us, however, must consider the motive will of a man who spends five years preparing himself and his terror cell to hijack an airliner and smash it into a skyscraper. That motivating will is enormous. Harnessed to a destructive enterprise, his hatred for modernity as expressed in Western culture, global trade and liberal democracy becomes a powerful propulsive force.

The responsible among us know the answer to the question, "Would men who smash airliners into skyscrapers and believe murdering thousands assures them eternity in Paradise flinch from using nuclear bombs or nerve gas on Peoria, San Antonio, Miami or yes, New York, if they could acquire such weapons?"

The answer is, "They'd use a nuke in a New York minute."

We can't forget the imagery of smashed skyscrapers, and we shouldn't. It is common sense, however the recognition of the need to protect our families' lives and the good that is America that motivates America's pursuit of the War on Terror.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide