- The Washington Times - Thursday, April 24, 2003

A Philadelphia-based campus watchdog group has sued a state school in central Pennsylvania because of its "unconstitutional" speech code, beginning a campaign to eliminate such codes nationwide.
On Tuesday, attorneys for the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania against Shippensburg University and its president, Anthony F. Ceddia, asserting that the undergraduate plaintiffs faced punishment up to expulsion for engaging in constitutionally protected expression.
Plaintiffs "John Doe," a junior majoring in earth science, and "Jane Doe," a senior majoring in political science, are identified in the suit as belonging to "at least one expressive student organization."
FIRE calls its suit a "facial challenge" to the school's policies, asserting that the rules threaten so much protected speech that their very existence violates the First Amendment.
FIRE's president, University of Pennsylvania historian Alan Charles Kors, said the move is the first step in a campaign "to end the nightmare of campus censorship." Mr. Kors founded FIRE in 1999 with Boston civil rights lawyer Harvey A. Silverglate.
Mr. Kors called such codes "a moral, educational and legal scandal in American higher education. A nation that does not educate in liberty will not long preserve it and will not even know when it is lost."
Peter M. Gigliotti, Shippensburg's executive director of university communications and marketing, declined to discuss the specific points of FIRE's legal complaint with United Press International yesterday.
Mr. Gigliotti issued an official statement, which said that although the university "strongly and vigorously" defends the right of free speech, it also is committed to the principle that discussion be conducted appropriately.
"We do have expectations that our students will conduct themselves in a civil manner that allows them to express their opinions without interfering with the rights of others," the statement said.
FIRE's Executive Director Thor L. Halvorssen said that during the next year the foundation would coordinate challenges to campus speech codes in each of the 12 federal appellate circuits.
The Shippensburg complaint quotes from the university's "Racism and Cultural Diversity" policy set forth in its catalog, which warns of "the continuing presence of unconscious attitudes toward individuals which surface through the use of discriminatory semantics."
Students are admonished against the use of "presumptive statements" that contribute to "historically preferred views of people."
In the preamble to Shippensburg's Code of Conduct, the university says it will "strive" to protect freedom of inquiry, speech, action and expression only if they are not "inflammatory, demeaning or harmful toward others." The preamble then prohibits "acts of intolerance directed toward other community members."
In the Code of Conduct's Community Regulations section, a "secondary right" to express personal beliefs is subordinated to a "primary right" to be "free from harassment, intimidation … and emotional abuse."
Mr. Kors said: "Of course, the expression most in need of protection is precisely 'provocative' dissent from widely held views, even if those provoked see that as 'demeaning.'"
"Racism" as defined by Shippensburg is the "subordination" of another person communicated not only through words, but also through "attitudes." "Harassment" includes conduct that "annoys" or "alarms" a person or group.
The school also mandates, under threat of official punishment, that students display in their attitudes and behaviors a "commitment to racial tolerance, cultural diversity and social justice."
FIRE called this requirement "a flagrant violation of freedom of conscience."

LOAD COMMENTS ()

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide