- The Washington Times - Thursday, August 28, 2003

Let us turn our eyes from reports that the economy is growing vigorously again. Let us avert our gaze from terrorists and the Middle East. Consider the Democratic presidential nominating process. For comic relief, all that would improve it would be the presence of Arianna Huffington, and she might make her entry yet.

Things have been going swimmingly for Dr. Howard Dean’s presidential campaign until a thick gray storm cloud floated over his shiny oval of a head the other day. In New Hampshire, scene of the first presidential primary, he had forged ahead of his nearest opponent, Sen. John Pierre Kerry. Last month it was the Francophone senator who was ahead, 25 percent to 22 percent. Now Dr. Howard Dean is ahead 38 percent to 17 percent in New Hampshire. Vast crowds have been turning up all over the country to hear him. In Seattle, Washington, 10,000 showed up in another of what the New York Times reports are “seemingly spontaneous crowds.” You know, word spreads from Starbucks to Starbucks, from health food shop to health food shop: “Dr. Howard Dean is coming.” Of a sudden, 20,000 Birkenstocks are stomping toward Dr. Howard Dean’s venue.

There they will hear Dr. Howard Dean, attired in button-down dress shirt and a nice tie — he never wears a jacket, sports jacket or otherwise. That is part of his message: “Don’t be stuffy.” So he leaves the jacket in the plane. He does wear pants, usually the suit pants to the jacket that he does not wear, and he wears leather shoes, but rarely wingtips. Richard Nixon wore wingtips. A lot of Dr. Howard Dean’s supporters remember Nixon, not with fondness. Nixon lied to the American people.

Dr. Howard Dean’s wardrobe is only part of his magic. He is very angry with President George W. Bush. In fact, of all the Democratic candidates Dr. Howard Dean is the maddest. This seems to be the reason for the large crowds. They are really mad too. They love it when Dr. Howard Deans says things such as, “When this president talks, sometimes the opposite of what he says is really the truth.” As with Nixon so with George W. Bush, liberal Democrats do not like to be lied to. That is one of the things they admired about Bill Clinton. He never lied to the American people… unnecessarily.

“He’s not running a campaign, he’s running a movement,” writes Natasha C. on the Dean Web site, if the New York Times is to be believed. “These are protest-size crowds, these are not politics-size crowds, and that makes a critical difference,” Ms. C. asseverates. Indeed it does. Join the first protest of the 21st century. The only problem this protest movement faces is that there is almost nothing to protest. Yet Dr. Howard Dean can face up to that problem later. For now, he has that storm cloud overhead.

Just as he is forging ahead in the polls and his fund-raising appeals are enriching the campaign so handsomely that he is considering eschewing federal funds by ignoring spending limits, comes devastating news. One of his opponents among the nine Democrats seeking the party’s coveted nomination, former Illinois Sen. Carol Moseley Braun, has been endorsed by the National Organization for Women’s Political Action committee and by the National Women’s Political Caucus — two in one day.

“We are particularly pleased that out of a field of strong progressive candidates, the strongest feminist candidate turns out to be a woman,” intoned the president of the National Organization for Women upon announcing her support of former Sen. Braun. I suppose this is another first, a woman Democratic presidential candidate who is also a feminist or is it a feminist Democratic presidential candidate who is also a woman? At any rate, former Sen. Braun was equally obscure. Said she: “Together we are going to take the ‘men only’ sign off the White House door.” Possibly she does not know how big the White House is. It has many doors, and I cannot recall any with a “Men Only” sign on it.

So it looks like Dr. Howard Dean is not going to get the feminist vote. In his party, that is a large percentage of the vote. Now what if Sen. John Pierre Kerry takes the gay vote? And what if the environmentalists go to Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich? We know the unions lean toward other candidates, and very few African-Americans appear in Dr. Howard Dean’s spontaneous crowds.

The problem the clever Dr. Howard Dean faces is that his party is a melange of one-issue enthusiasts. Dr. Dean has reached for the antiwar crowd, but what about the other groups? He hopes to corral them by striking the one chord that holds them all together — hatred of President George W. Bush. Democrats get very mad when they think someone other than a Democrat is lying to them.

R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. is the editor in chief of the American Spectator, a contributing editor to the New York Sun and an adjunct fellow at the Hudson Institute.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide