- The Washington Times - Tuesday, December 16, 2003

THE HAGUE (AP) — The United States asked the United Nations’ highest legal body not to interfere in its criminal-justice system, demanding yesterday that the U.N. court throw out a case filed by Mexico over the death penalty.

The International Court of Justice is hearing a suit charging that 52 Mexican citizens on U.S. death row were denied a fair trial because they weren’t told that they had a right to help from the Mexican consulate.

Mexico asked the court on Monday to order that the men’s cases be returned to the moment of their arrest and started again.

But representing the United States, William Taft — great-grandson of President and Chief Justice William Howard Taft — said that the request was “unprecedented” and that the international court was “not a criminal appeal court.”

The court already had “traveled a considerable distance” in a previous rulings against the United States, Mr. Taft said.

“The United States urges that it go no further.”

The International Court of Justice, also known as the world court, is the U.N. judicial body for resolving disputes between countries.

At the center of Mexico’s claim is the Vienna Convention, a 1963 treaty signed by both countries that says people traveling or living abroad have the right to contact their consulates when they are accused of a serious crime.

Mexico argued Monday that because consular help “could have, in capital proceedings, made the difference between life and death” for the men, the only fair way to repair the wrong was to start the legal process over.

But Mr. Taft argued yesterday that in a similar case in 2001, the court had ruled that the remedy “must be left to the United States. Must be.”

He said otherwise, U.S. police and prosecutors in every jurisdiction would be “held hostage” while they coordinated their criminal investigations with foreign consulates.

In the 2001 case, the court found that the United States had failed to inform a German citizen of his right to consular assistance.

But Walter LaGrand already had been executed in Arizona, in defiance of an injunction by the international court.

Hearings in the Mexico case conclude Friday. No date has been set for a ruling.

The case drew international attention in February, when the court’s 15-judge panel unanimously ordered the United States to delay the executions of three men until it could hear the case in full. None of the three has had an execution date set.

The Mexicans named in the suit are imprisoned in California, Texas, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma and Oregon.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide