- The Washington Times - Tuesday, December 23, 2003

BERKELEY, Calif. — California vintners are hoping mail-order and online sales will deliver new profits this season, with more states than ever allowing consumers to have wine shipped to them directly from the producer.

“There’ll be lots of wine in people’s stockings, I hope,” said Tom Shelton, president of Joseph Phelps Vineyards in St. Helena. “I think we’ve made extraordinary progress this year.”

A decade ago, only a few states permitted wineries to ship directly to consumers. But the number is now 26, with recent federal court decisions striking down bans in Michigan, Texas and Virginia. The issue is expected to wind up before the Supreme Court.

Laws governing wine shipments go back to 1933, when the 21st Amendment repealed the 13-year dry spell of Prohibition and gave states the right to regulate alcohol.

The result is a hodgepodge, with some states allowing customers to order from in-state but not out-of-state wineries while others allow customers to order only from other states with which they have signed reciprocal agreements. Meanwhile, some states have made direct wine shipments a felony.

Wine producers say the restrictive laws are arcane and need to be jettisoned.

But wholesalers argue doing that would trample states’ rights, cut tax revenues and give teens unprecedented access to alcohol.

“You have a small handful of elitist kinds of thinkers who want to get their wine or the particular version of wine that they can’t get. They’re trying to change the whole system and make it more dangerous, less controlled,” said Craig Wolf, general counsel for the Washington-based Wine & Spirits Wholesalers of America.

Both sides have hired big names to press their cases. The wine industry has Kenneth W. Starr, best known for prosecuting the Monica Lewinsky case against President Clinton; liquor distributors have Robert Bork, the former federal appeals court judge rejected by the Senate in 1987 for a Supreme Court post.

Proponents of wine shipments say they give customers more choice and boost smaller wineries.

“Some boutique wineries will probably see a pickup simply because they’re going to put a lot of effort behind this,” said Peter Ekman, of Wine.com, an online retailer.

Pro-shippers say concerns raised by wholesalers are overblown.

Wineries are willing to work out a system to pay sales taxes, said Mr. Shelton, and he doubts that allowing more shipping will put a serious dent in the three-tier system in which wine is shipped from maker to wholesaler to restaurants and retailers. “Here in California we’ve been direct shipping for 20 years and we have a very robust wholesale tier that makes a lot of money,” he said.

As for teen drinking, shipping proponents argue it’s harder for teens to order wine over the phone or by Internet, which requires a credit card and an adult’s signature for delivery, than to go the old-fashioned route by obtaining a fake ID or hanging around a liquor store in hopes an adult will buy for them.

FedEx spokesman Howard Clabo said his company is training its drivers to deliver alcohol properly and accepts packages only from companies enrolled in its wine shipping program.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide