- The Washington Times - Monday, December 29, 2003

ASSOCIATED PRESS

Democrats running for president complain that they can’t fully explain their views on foreign policy, health care or national security in debates featuring all nine candidates.

Surely, then, they can’t do it in commercials that last only 30 seconds, or, for that matter, in newspaper ads or television interviews edited to sound bites.

To compensate, some of the candidates are buying half-hour blocks of airtime in early primary and caucus states to broadcast programs that allow them to speak at length about whatever they choose.

Whether voters are tuning in, however, is debatable.

“The conventional wisdom is that nobody will sit for 30 minutes to listen to a political message,” said Darrell West, a political-science professor at Brown University. “This year is different because the country is polarized. There’s also a market for longer presentations at a time when so many substantive issues are on the agenda.”

Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean has run half-hour programs in Wisconsin, New Mexico and Iowa that profiled his family, featured supporters and sought donations. In New Hampshire, Sen. Joe Lieberman has aired footage from a town-hall meeting where he talked about issues such as prescription drugs and the environment. Sen. John Kerry held a similar forum that was broadcast live across Iowa, and he plans another live forum for early January in New Hampshire.

The concept isn’t new. Ross Perot spent millions filling the TV airwaves with half-hour ads with quirky titles such as “Deep Voodoo, Chicken Feathers and The American Dream” during his presidential runs in 1992 and 1996. George W. Bush, Al Gore and Bill Bradley each ran at least one long-format program in the 2000 primaries.

“We’re definitely seeing more of them now,” said Marion Meginnis, general manager of WQAD in Moline, Ill., which broadcasts into Iowa.

It’s unclear how effective such programs are because the media markets where they have aired until now are so small that viewership isn’t measured frequently. As a result, campaigns use other measures to determine how many people are watching, such as the numbers of phone calls or donations they receive on the days that such programs run.

The 2004 candidates are running their extended spots mainly on Saturday evenings or on Sundays, when stations have longer and cheaper time slots available. To ensure viewership, the campaigns have held “watch parties” for supporters and undecided voters.

Mr. Dean ran a half-hour program once early this month as a test in a relatively cheap media market, Madison, Wis., to determine its effectiveness. The spot, which included information about Mr. Dean’s experiences as a doctor and Vermont governor, cost $2,100. The campaign collected more than that in donations on the day it ran, and it decided to run the program again in that media market as well as in Albuquerque, N.M., and Des Moines and Cedar Rapids, Iowa.

Scott Reed, a Republican consultant who was the manager of Bob Dole’s 1996 presidential campaign, said Mr. Dole never ran half-hour spots because he wasn’t in a crowded field like the 2004 Democrats, who are using the long-format programs to distinguish themselves from one another.

Besides, Mr. Reed said, such lengthy spots are “a total waste of money.”


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide