- The Washington Times - Friday, December 5, 2003

SALT LAKE CITY — A judge yesterday threw out all charges against two men accused of bribing IOC members with $1million in gifts, cash and favors to bring the 2002 Olympics to Salt Lake City, saying prosecutors hadn’t proved their case. The Justice Department openly questioned the ruling.

The decision came mid-trial, one day after prosecutors wrapped up their case against Tom Welch, who led the city’s bid to hold the Olympics, and his deputy, Dave Johnson.

U.S. District Court Judge David Sam told jurors the prosecution had presented “insufficient evidence” to justify the trial going forward. He criticized the prosecution, saying the case “offends my sense of justice.”

Assistant Attorney General Christopher A. Wray said the Justice Department was “disappointed” in the judge’s ruling, claiming the evidence the jury was permitted to hear was more than sufficient for the case to go to verdict.

“The government believes the Olympics bribery case was an important one to bring to uphold the rule of law, and we continue to believe that the citizens of the United States, especially the people of the state of Utah, had the right to have this criminal case decided by a jury,” said Wray, who heads the department’s criminal division.

He said the department was “grateful” for an earlier appeals court reversal in the case that allowed the government to bring the matter to trial but “regrets that he ruled before the jury could decide the case, leaving the government with no further opportunity to appeal.”

Throughout the trial, Sam — who tossed out the original charges against the bid leaders before they were reinstated by an appeals court — repeatedly ruled against prosecutors on evidence and frequently shut down their lines of questioning.

Sam entered a judgment of acquittal for Welch and Johnson. His decision can’t be appealed because defendants cannot be tried twice for the same crime.

Welch sat stoically as the judge issued his ruling, but Johnson wiped tears from his face and moments later gave defense lawyer Max Wheeler a long hug. The two men had faced up to 75 years in prison if convicted on all counts.

Justice Department fraud prosecutor Richard Wiedis had urged the judge Thursday to reject the defense request to drop the charges, saying, “To dismiss this case now is to deprive the jury of its right to make a statement that Olympic corruption must be stopped.”

Wiedis had argued that Welch and Johnson defrauded their overseers by misappropriating money from a humanitarian program to dole out gifts and favors to the IOC delegates who awarded Utah the Games in 1995.

The “assistance program” was actually meant for impoverished athletes from developing countries, but just 10 percent of the money “went to sports equipment — soccer balls for athletes who needed and deserved them,” Wiedis said.

FBI agent Paul Bingham, the final prosecution witness to take the stand Thursday, went over charts summarizing payments and perks doled out to 15 of the IOC delegates plus some relatives including trips to Disneyland, stopovers at Paris hotels, tuition at U.S. schools and car repairs. The IOC kicked out seven delegates, and three others resigned over the scandal.

Johnson’s lawyer, Max Wheeler, said the government did little at trial but “put lots of money in front of this jury and ask them to speculate as to the purpose of those payments.”

“We have not heard from a single witness of a person being bribed,” he said.

Some of the government’s own witnesses disputed the bribery accusations. They included Olympic trustee Spencer Eccles, the patriarch of a wealthy Utah banking clan, who donated $500,000 for the Olympic pursuit and turned on prosecutors Monday, calling their case “ill-conceived.”

Welch and Johnson have insisted they committed no crime, and both refused to accept government plea offers before and after their July 2000 indictment.

The case asserted wrongdoing at virtually every step of Salt Lake’s first serious Olympic bid campaigns starting in 1989 — even before it was designated as the U.S. candidate city — and running for a decade.

After the ruling, Wiedis said the judge had been “too hard” on the government.

Rep. Chris Cannon, Utah Republican, who chairs the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law, said the panel might hold hearings next year to examine the government’s handling of the case.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide