- The Washington Times - Thursday, February 27, 2003

Education Secretary Rod Paige said last night that he would not consider any major changes in Title IX, the federal education law that requires equal sports opportunities for men and women.
Mr. Paige said he would only consider recommendations that drew unanimous support from his Commission on Opportunity in Athletics.
The unanimity requirement would kill at least eight of the 23 ideas, including the most-contentious ones that came under the harshest feminist criticism, including a proposal to change how schools can show they don't discriminate.
Mr. Paige, who had not set a timetable for any decisions, took action within hours of receiving the commission's report. Among the ideas to be scrapped by Mr. Paige's move:
Allowing schools to measure sports participation in new ways, such as excluding non-scholarship athletes from counts or including available roster slots even if they're not used.
Giving schools more leeway to accept private sports money, which proponents said could keep teams afloat, but feminist critics said would amount to slush funds for better-supported men's sports.
Letting schools exclude older, "nontraditional" students from their counts based on a view that they are less likely to participate in sports. Some commissioners disputed this.
Mr. Paige's swift and unexpected move came on a day when feminist critics trumpeted their minority views and commission leaders defended their work as thoughtful, fair and overdue.
"This report includes several recommendations unanimously agreed upon by all of the commissioners in public meetings," Mr. Paige said in a statement late last night.
"I am pleased that the commission, made up of a diverse group of individuals with vastly different points of view, was able to agree on some important recommendations, and the department intends to move forward only on those recommendations," he said.
In a Title IX debate often marked by confusion, Mr. Paige's comments created more as observers tried to assess exactly what he meant.
Education Department spokesman John Gibbons confirmed that Mr. Paige will only consider unanimous votes, not ones approved with lesser support.
Otherwise, education officials would not elaborate on Mr. Paige's statement.
The Title IX debate has grown intense in recent weeks, putting increasing focus on how Mr. Paige would respond. By embracing only the most palatable proposals, he may defuse some of the feminist opposition's momentum, but such critics were wary at best.
"This reflects how much of an outcry there has been, and how important it is for there to be a spotlight on what happens next," said Marcia Greenberger, president of the National Women's Law Center, which has opposed changing Title IX enforcement.
One of the remaining suggestions, for example, says the Education Department should explore ways for schools to prove they don't discriminate.
"That last one is so wide open, it gives them license to do anything. It basically brings all the other ones back into play," said Julie Foudy, one of two commission members to balk at the group's report. She had voted for the recommendation but withdrew her support after seeing how it appeared in the final report.
Mr. Paige also risks grumbles from other commission members who, through majority votes, worked for months on ideas that now may go nowhere.
Earlier in the day, commission co-Chairmen Ted Leland and Cynthia Cooper spoke with pride about all of the recommendations.
They rejected doomsday claims, saying female athletes will be better off with new enforcement.
"I myself am a product of Title IX, and I have benefited from the law," said Mrs. Cooper, a women's basketball legend. "So I would never do anything that would possibly weaken the law or set back the progress that women have made."
Mr. Paige focused on four unanimous ideas: reaffirming a commitment to equal opportunity for men and women, aggressively enforcing the equity law, giving equal weight to each of the three ways schools can show compliance, and making clear that the Education Department disapproves of cutting teams as part of Title IX.
Some schools contend they have had no choice but to cut male teams, with such sports as gymnastics and wrestling taking the biggest hit, to bring the number of male athletes in line with female ones. Such concerns led to a lawsuit against the Education Department that still stands.
The commission's message of consensus took a hit when two of its three marquee athletes, soccer player Mrs. Foudy and Olympic swimmer Donna de Varona, repudiated the report.
Famous athletes, actors and Democratic senators have rallied behind the cause to "Save Title IX."
Mr. Leland and Mrs. Cooper said they found that push perplexing. There is no effort to change the law itself, and giving schools more ways to comply won't hurt women, they said.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide