- The Washington Times - Tuesday, February 4, 2003

The Pentagon's proposed $380 billion budget for 2004 reflects Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld's decision to shift spending priorities from improving today's weapons to developing tomorrow's.
Mr. Rumsfeld wants to cancel or curtail numerous weapons programs, including planned improvements to the Army's Abrams battle tank, and put billions into futuristic weapons like drone aircraft that would launch bombs and missiles and the Global Hawk unmanned spy plane to replace the Air Force's U-2.
The proposed spending for the budget year starting Oct. 1 is $15.3 billion higher than the current budget, reflecting a 4.2 percent increase, and actual Pentagon spending will be even higher because the administration intends to ask Congress for at least one "supplemental" budget of $15 billion or more to pay for fighting the war on terrorism.
If there is a war against Iraq, the Pentagon will need even more money. And the aftermath of war to include finding and securing any weapons of mass destruction and helping to rebuild the country will cost untold billions more. The Pentagon has refused to disclose its early estimates of the likely cost of an Iraqi war.
The budget plan the administration presented to Congress on Monday projects even greater increases in defense spending in coming years. It would grow to $400 billion in 2005, $440 billion by 2007 and $483 billion in 2009 and those totals do not include roughly $17 billion each year that would go to the Energy Department for defense-related nuclear programs.
Congress authorizes and appropriates money for the Pentagon only one year at a time; the "out-year" spending projections are for planning purposes. Mr. Rumsfeld says he would like to change to two-year budgets.
The 2004 budget proposes military pay raises ranging from 2 percent for the most junior troops to 6.2 percent for certain higher ranks that the Pentagon believes are the most difficult to keep filled.
The size of the active-duty military would remain steady at 1.39 million men and women.
By service, the spending would be divided as follows:
Army, $93.7 billion, up 3 percent.
Navy, including the Marine Corps, $114.6 billion, up 3.5 percent.
Air Force, $113.7 billion, up 5.7 percent.
The rest of the Defense Department would get $57.9 billion, up 3 percent.
Although the Bush administration strongly suggested when it took office in 2001 that it was inclined to cancel at least one of the Pentagon's three next-generation fighter aircraft programs and possibly also the Marine Corps' troubled V-22 Osprey helicopter-airplane hybrid all of them have survived.
The Air Force would get $5.2 billion next year to buy 22 of its F/A-22 strike fighters; the Navy would get $3.5 billion to buy 42 of its F/A-18 Super Hornets and the multiservice Joint Strike Fighter, which is not yet in production, would get $4.4 billion.
The Pentagon would spend $1.1 billion to buy 11 V-22 Ospreys, including the first two special-operations variants to be used by the Air Force. Another $544 million would be spent on V-22 testing and evaluation.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide