- The Washington Times - Thursday, January 30, 2003

ADDIS ABABA, Ethiopia Down the cobbled alleyways of this capital, up above the grocery stores, and tucked away behind garages and hairdressing salons are the offices of Ethiopia's thriving private presses.
There sit the journalists, hunched and crowded around rickety tables, typing away under flickering lights and bemoaning the broken phone lines, the low salaries, low prestige and the proposed press laws.
Since the Derg regime of dictator Mengistu Haile Mariam ended 11 years ago, private newspapers have been sprouting in this country. At last count, there were 93, most of which have an average staff of two (who usually need to subsidize themselves), a readership of a few thousand (approximately 65 percent of Ethiopia's 65 million people are illiterate) and scant advertisers. Their biggest fan club? Boiled-bean vendors, who use newsprint to wrap their wares. This might be the best use for some of them, detractors say.
While the number of responsible, professional private papers here is growing, many editors rely heavily on "borrowed" copy from the Internet or unverified stories that have little relation to the truth: The Ethiopian president is reported dead, the exact date of a U.S. invasion of Iraq is announced and various businessmen are charged with corruption.
Not surprisingly, the government wants more accountability. Proposed laws introduced this month seek to regulate printed press, and they are expected to sail though parliament next month. But journalists see it as a blow to this country's emerging democracy.
"This is a death sentence passed on the freedom of press in Ethiopia," writes Amare Aregawi, editor of the Reporter. He points out that in a country where radio and television are still state-owned, the private print press is the only nongovernment voice being heard. "[The proposal] was born out of anger and the wish to exact revenge," he said, "and makes the country, the public and the government a laughingstock of the world."
But Ethiopia is just one of several young African democracies where reporters and the government are fighting about the right balance between encouraging a responsible press and allowing journalists to perform their role as watchdogs freely.
Diplomats and other observers here say that, while perhaps not quite as draconian as journalists assert, Ethiopia's proposed new laws with their long, ambiguous clauses are a clumsy step in the wrong direction for this fledgling democracy. They had hoped, they say, that the government and the press both equally unused to freedom of expression might have found a better way of regulating the media.
"This is a country with no real experience in plural democracy," said Laura Williams, a political secretary at the British Embassy. "So you have [a] government which understands, intellectually, that it needs to loosen up, but emotionally finds it hard to accept criticism from the outside." On the other hand, she noted, "There are some papers that don't understand journalists have a duty to tell the truth." The outcome, she added, is that government "tars all papers, good and bad, with the same brush and now plans to further deny them access or freedom. It's not good."
The law, if passed, will prohibit any reporting on opposition party activities, for example, as well as ban the printing of any government documents, henceforth classified as confidential. No funding or assistance to the private press from outside sources will be allowed (which seems to include fundamentalist Islamic organizations and invitations to professional conferences at the U.S. Embassy alike) and press releases from nongovernmental organizations will be considered ads that must be paid for and taxed. Access to government officials, now notoriously difficult, will be made even harder.
"We want the government to stop regarding the private press as enemies," said Josh Friedman, director of the board of the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), on a visit to Ethiopia several months before the new laws were presented.
The British Embassy here had been trying to organize workshops for the government and the private press to discuss the problems at hand and avert a wider clash between them. At the first meeting, the private press, denied the right to speak, walked out. Next month, the embassy plans to try again.
Few African countries have found a comfortable balance between the government and free press. The Economic Freedom of the World 2002 Annual Report put out by the Fraser Institute of Vancouver, British Columbia found that with few exceptions (South Africa, and to a lesser degree Botswana and Mauritius) African governments were the worst offenders in the world in restricting the freedoms, including press freedom, of their citizens.
For example, in neighboring Eritrea, its authoritarian rulers have shuttered the independent press completely and jailed those who dare criticize them. CPJ ranked President Issaias Afeworki of Eritrea and Zimbabwe's Robert Mugabe as Africa's "most repressive" leaders when regarding press freedoms. The Ethiopian government, which blanches at any comparison with Eritrea, argues that its situation is completely different.
"The new press laws are not censorship," said Netsannet Asfaw, state minister for information. "They are a demand that responsible press use some self-censorship."
Mrs. Asfaw fought on the front lines against the previous regime. Today, she sees that fight continuing only now it's directed against the private press which, she believes, represents little more than the leftovers of the old Marxist regime. "They are never accountable for what they write," she said. "They write things just to spite us, stirring up ethnic and religious tensions and then hiding behind talk of democracy."
Dagnachew Teklu, chief writer of the private Daily Monitor, disagrees. "Let us have democracy, access and true freedom, and then accuse us afterwards if we distort the truth," he said.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide