- The Washington Times - Tuesday, July 15, 2003

House Majority Leader Tom DeLay yesterday drew a line in the sand by saying, hours before the Medicare conference committee opened, that House Republicans will not accept a bill that doesn’t force Medicare to compete directly with private health care plans by 2010.

“We’re trying to design a plan that meets those needs and at the same time hold down costs by introducing competition and introducing choice for seniors — that’s really important to those who voted for the bill that came out of the House, and I know I can’t see a bill coming out of conference with less than that,” Mr. DeLay, Texas Republican, told reporters at his weekly briefing.

On Monday, Mr. DeLay was named one of five Republican House members to the Medicare prescription-drug conference, which met for the first time yesterday.

One of the key sticking points House and Senate negotiators will have to resolve is whether to accept a House provision that would require traditional Medicare to compete against private health plans by 2010. House conservatives demand the provision, saying it will force Medicare to modernize and become more cost-effective. The Senate bill does not include that provision and most Democrats strongly oppose it.

Now House conservatives are looking to the White House to weigh in and back them up by supporting the provision.

“We need those reforms in the conference report, and we need the president’s help to do that,” said Rep. Paul D. Ryan, Wisconsin Republican.

Mr. Ryan and 75 other Republicans sent a letter to the president last week urging that the 2010 competition stipulation be included in the conference report. Mr. Ryan said the letter was meant to urge the White House to take a stand on the issue.

Mr. Ryan said conservatives are “fearful that the White House may end up siding with the Senate bill.”

Rep. Jim DeMint, South Carolina Republican, said he is confident the president will weigh in on the issue “either visibly or under the radar.” Mr. DeMint said that it has been the president’s vision all along to introduce competition with the new drug benefit and to create a setup like federal employees’ health-benefits program.

But Democrats said the competition provisions are a deal-breaker.

“That’s not 2010 competition; that’s 2010 destruction of Medicare,” said Rep. John D. Dingell, Michigan Democrat and a conferee.

No action was taken to meld the two bills yesterday, but the conference hopes to meet again by early next week at the latest.

While House Republicans don’t need most Democrats’ support in their chamber, Senate Republicans have said they want to pass something with bipartisan support in their chamber.

Senate Democrats said that means no competition provisions, and three dozen of them communicated that in a letter to Mr. Bush last week.

Sen. Max Baucus, Montana Democrat, said he hasn’t heard the White House endorse the competition provisions and said he would be surprised if Mr. Bush did.

“That’s a steep hill to climb,” he said. “My guess is the White House is much more interested in getting the bill passed.”

Mr. Bush was scheduled to meet with some of the conferees at the White House yesterday but the meeting was postponed for scheduling reasons.

Mr. DeLay yesterday made it clear that Republicans hope to keep the support of conservatives who voted for the House plan that passed 216-215 on June 27.

“Obviously we have a one-vote margin in the House and so we have to be very … You know, there are several members including myself who think it’s very important to strengthen and improve the health care for seniors and bring us into the 21st century,” he said.

Still, even the 2010 competition provisions aren’t enough to win the support of some conservatives who question whether the reforms will ever happen.

“Reforms in 2010? That’s a pig in a poke. It’s just a fig leaf to get people on board,” said Rep. Jeff Flake, Arizona Republican.

He said his preferred scenario is for the conference committee to be unable to produce a bill and for the Congress to “then go back to basic principles of reform,” adding that “the president is the only one at this point who can do it.”

Democrats on the other side of the issue also say they would rather see nothing pass than a bill with the competition provisions included.

“I cannot support a bill that would adversely affect Medicare,” Mr. Dingell said.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide