- The Washington Times - Monday, July 28, 2003

Playing with history

As far as the 3,600-member Historical Miniatures Gaming Society is concerned, this year’s Iraqi Republican Guard counterattack against U.S. troops during a fierce days-long sandstorm is one of the great battles of history.

In fact, a hypothetical battle during a sandstorm, between the U.S. Army’s 3rd Infantry Division and the Republican Guard, was just played out, albeit on a tabletop. It’s called “historical miniatures gaming,” a relatively unknown slice of Americana that promotes the study of military history by simulating warfare through the use of hand-painted miniatures and three-dimensional model landscapes.

“Imagine a table covered with hills, trees and villages — a model landscape much like those seen on a model railroad layout,” says Del Stover, a longtime war gamer and member of the Alexandria-based society’s board of directors. “But then cover it with hundreds of hand-painted toy soldiers. And then watch as hobbyists maneuver their troops across this battlefield using rules much like chess.”

Just this past weekend, “gamers” gathered at a convention in Lancaster, Pa., to refight not only the recent Iraq war, but other battles, such as “Crossing the Euphrates,” depicting the U.S. Marines in battle with the Republican Guard during the Persian Gulf war. Also played out in miniature form was “Somalia 2002,” in which American “Special Ops” strike at al Qaeda terrorist training camps in Somalia.

Last weekend’s convention displayed hundreds of miniature battlefields, from ancient Rome and Napoleon’s campaigns in Europe to the U.S. Civil War, World War II and Vietnam.

Mr. Stover alone has a collection of more than 7,000 miniatures. Robert Cortese, a combat veteran of the 1979 U.S. rescue mission in Grenada and an author specializing in military technology and tactics, was on hand to lecture on “Baghdad 2003.” His talk centered on urban warfare in Iraq and the ongoing low-intensity terrorist campaign being fought worldwide.

No right turns

Suffice it to say if newspaper reporters of the liberal persuasion ever left the fourth estate for greener pastures, the journalism industry as we know it would fold — for lack of manpower. Consider a Freedom Forum survey published several years ago revealing that a wide majority of Washington scribes and editors consider themselves liberals or moderates. The poll of 130 journalists, in fact, found a whopping 89 percent had voted for President Clinton in 1996. Like it or not, that’s the nature of the beast. All the American public can do is hope that reporters present readers all sides of a news story, as they were instructed to do in Journalism 101.

Same story for conservative scribes, what few exist. Bryan O’Keefe is editor in chief of George Washington University’s alternative newspaper, the GW Patriot. Now beginning a job search, Mr. O’Keefe writes that his journalism professor had some connections with the Dallas Morning News and was able to land the student a sit-down interview with the large Texas daily.

“During the interview the Patriot came up, but I clearly told the editors that … I can put aside any bias I might have and report everything ‘fair and balanced,’ and I have many newspaper clippings, from both a newspaper I worked for back home and the main newspaper at GW, to support this.”

“I also could list any number of journalism professors who would say the same thing,” Mr. O’Keefe adds. “Well, I get a call this morning from the editor and she officially says that because I was involved with a conservative newspaper and college Republicans they will not hire me. Can you believe this? I am absolutely incredulous at this. Would they say the same for someone who worked for a liberal paper, i.e. the main student newspapers?” Mr. O’Keefe asks. “I can only imagine if a liberal student didn’t get hired because of their political beliefs.”

Sound judgment

When it comes to global warming, President Bush has decided to step back and take a deep breath. The nonpartisan Competitive Enterprise Institute is praising the calmer approach to the science of climate change just announced by the Bush administration in a report released jointly by the departments of Commerce and Energy. It lists the scientific goals of the U.S. Climate Change Science Program, including a better understanding of natural climate variability, resolving conflicts between predicted and observed climate patterns, and the role technological resilience should play in responding to any future climatic trends.

“We support President Bush’s emphasis on scientific research, and the broad goals of this plan look like they’ll set government research in the right direction,” says Myron Ebell, director of Global Warming and International Environmental Policy at CEI. “While the outline of the plan is encouraging, we hope the full text of the report doesn’t give away too much to the alarmist camp, as previous Bush documents have done.

“A research plan is no place to try to placate political opponents,” he adds.

For far too long, CEI contends, federally funded global warming research has been a tool of “alarmist ideologues” bent on convincing policy-makers that human-induced climate change requires drastic government intervention, whatever the status of the science itself. It says through misleading summaries of technical studies and omission of conflicting evidence, previous studies have been intentionally crafted to support the alarmist position.

Amusement tracks

A leading congressman is telling the tax collector to quit snooping around auto racing. Rep. J.D. Hayworth, Arizona Republican and member of the House Ways and Means Committee, introduced a bill Friday to settle a simmering dispute between the Internal Revenue Service and the booming motorsport industry.

The IRS recently has questioned a 29-year industry practice of depreciating motorsport entertainment facilities as amusement or theme parks, whose assets qualify for a seven-year depreciation schedule for tax purposes. The proposed legislation would clarify that a “motorsports entertainment complex” is entitled to the seven-year depreciation treatment. It defines a “motorsports entertainment complex” as a permanent, fixed racetrack facility that hosts automobile, truck or motorcycle race events that are open to the public for the price of admission. The Hayworth legislation covers more than 900 tracks nationwide, in all 50 states, from drag strips to super speedways.

John McCaslin, a nationally syndicated columnist, can be reached at 202/636-3284 or [email protected]

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide