- The Washington Times - Tuesday, July 8, 2003

WIMBLEDON, England (AP) — The Williams sisters are so accustomed to being in Grand Slam finals that they had a camera at the ready for the trophy ceremony when Serena beat Venus at Wimbledon.

Winning a major title was all so new to Roger Federer that he broke down in tears a few times in the minutes after defeating Mark Philippoussis.

And therein lies the big difference between men’s and women’s tennis at the moment: The women have a pair of dominant players — who happen to be from the same family — while the men keep spreading the wealth.

A case could be made that both are good for the game’s popularity.

Rivalries and dynasties tend to help sports attract fans, and you get two for the price of one with Team Williams. Some might argue, however, that there is something to be said for new matchups and changing champions, which keep the sport fresh.

The truth is, though, that individual sports need someone at the fore, a Tiger Woods or a Martina Navratilova, for example.

Someone whose majesty attracts even casual fans.

“Tennis needs a clear hierarchy,” three-time Wimbledon champion Boris Becker wrote in yesterday’s Times of London. “It needs players of talent who are seen to dominate.”

Serena and Venus have played each other in five of the past six major finals, with Serena winning each time. Going back to Wimbledon in 2000, the sisters have claimed nine of the past 13 Grand Slams. Only two other players won a major in that span: Jennifer Capriati and Justine Henin-Hardenne.

When Henin-Hardenne beat fellow Belgian Kim Clijsters in the French Open final, the TV ratings were 39 percent lower than for last year’s all-Williams matchup there.

Now take a look at the men’s game, where everyone seems to get a turn. Federer is the seventh player to win in the past seven Grand Slams, one shy of the Open era record set in the 1970s and equaled last year.

Not too many people in the United States have heard of Federer — and that number didn’t get much larger Sunday. His 7-6 (5), 6-2, 7-6 (3) victory over Mark Philippoussis drew the lowest overnight rating on record for a Wimbledon men’s final.

The question now is whether Federer can take the next step and become a consistent champion, a la Pete Sampras (record 14 majors) or Andre Agassi (eight majors, including a career Grand Slam). Or will he be a one-hit wonder like Marat Safin, who seemed destined to collect a slew of majors when he broke through for his first at the 2000 U.S. Open but hasn’t followed up?

As for Federer, John McEnroe said, “This could open the door for him for many, many more, other majors — not just Wimbledon.”

Becker gushed, too.

“The leader of the pack is Roger Federer, the man who always knew he would be the best in the world and is ready to take over for a long time,” Becker wrote.

What’s remarkable about Federer’s game is that he does everything well. He might not have one particular overwhelming skill — a 140 mph serve, say, or the game’s most dangerous forehand — but there is nothing he can’t do if needed to win a match.

In his victory over Philippoussis and a straight-set semifinal win over Andy Roddick, Federer serve-and-volleyed, won rallies from the baseline and smacked volleys from the backcourt. He even outaced those two big servers by a combined 38-18 and showcased returning skills on a par with Agassi or Lleyton Hewitt.

Most important for his future success, Federer pushed aside all those questions about whether he could perform on the biggest stages and fulfill the promise he showed by stopping Sampras’ 31-match winning streak at Wimbledon two years ago.

“He always has had the great game, and he had the burden of so much talent to carry. Any time you have somebody that’s talented and doesn’t win, when you do win, it’s like: ‘It’s about time. How come you haven’t won before?’ It’s that monkey off the back,” Navratilova said. “When you win here, you think you can win anywhere.”

Serena Williams, like Federer just 21, already owns six Grand Slam titles (her first came at the 1999 U.S. Open). Only Steffi Graf (nine) and Monica Seles (eight) won more majors by a similar age, and Navratilova had just one by that time.

“If Serena keeps training hard and really gets some technical glitches out of her game, which is pretty scary,” Navratilova said, “then she’ll be the greatest of all time.”

And that would only help tennis.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2020 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide