- The Washington Times - Friday, March 7, 2003

Fifty years ago this month in Moscow, Josef Stalin died. He and his Red Army had been our allies (not formally but informally) in defeating Nazism and Fascism. Winston Churchill thought well of "old Joe" for a time. During the war American propaganda referred to his armies as "Our Heroic Soviet Allies," and President Roosevelt joshed that he was "Uncle Joe." Then we had a falling out with the mustachioed Georgian.
Upon the 1945 death of FDR (who, historians tell us, was growing uneasy about Joe), Harry Truman became president. He was even more uneasy about Stalin than Roosevelt. Truman rearmed the country, was rude to Uncle Joe's ambassador, and made Joe angry.
By the late 1940s, hostilities between Truman and Stalin had become serious. World peace was imperiled. Thankfully, from the more sophisticated sectors of American society a peace movement blossomed. Hollywoodians and professors, usually of a leftish persuasion, began marching for peace and beseeching Washington to negotiate with Stalin. Their peaceful protests provoked what Americans persist in calling the Red Scare, which featured such scoundrels the playwright Lillian Hellman's word as Sen. Joseph McCarthy, who claimed the peace movement and even the government were being subverted by Soviet sympathizers and spies. By the 1960s, scholars then referred to as revisionists were advancing the proposition that Truman's foreign policy and the fiendish McCarthy's Red Scare almost drove us to war with Uncle Joe, who died March 4, 1953.
Now after years of research in the Soviet and KGB archives, two historians, a Russian and an American, are about to publish a 402-page book, "Stalin's Last Crime," propounding the thesis that Uncle Joe was poisoned by members of his government probably led by the head of his secret police, Lavrenti Beria, to prevent Stalin from beginning a war with the United States, the preparation for which Stalin by 1953 had well under way.
Is it really possible that Uncle Joe was preparing world war in the early 1950s when the American peace movement insisted Washington was the provocateur? The evidence suggests that it is. In fact, so concerned were Stalin's colleagues in the Politburo that he was about to enmesh the Soviet Union in war with the West that, argue the authors of "Stalin's Last Crime," they poisoned him, fittingly enough using rat poison.
Historians, working in Soviet and KGB archives, have also dug up documents bearing on the Red Scare. From such sources as the Venona documents and the KGB archives we now know that from the 1930s through the 1940s there really were communists for Americans to be scared of. Working as agents for the Soviet Union or as artless sympathizers, Americans were practicing espionage for Moscow. Just as McCarthy said, they were active in our government, the American Communist Party and the peace movement. Soviet archives have revealed that such so-called victims of the Red Scare as Alger Hiss and Harry Dexter White were really working for Uncle Joe.
Now the thought naturally occurs, why would such admired members of the American establishment as Alger Hiss side with Stalin against the United States? For that matter why are so many of Hollywood's bien pensant demonstrating against the U.S. government and to save Saddam Hussein's neck? My guess is that, as with Hiss, they simply cannot believe the United States is a great force for good in the world. What this reveals is a very low opinion of the United States and a very cavalier regard for a dictator's capacity for evil.
Josef Stalin, we now learn, was contemplating nuclear war when his colleagues gave peace a chance and poisoned him. We know this from the Soviets' own archives. Why would we doubt that Saddam is up to equally grisly acts?
Both men have quite publicly been responsible for the brutal deaths of multitudes: for Stalin, by 1953, perhaps 100 million; for Saddam, by now, perhaps a million. These are moral monsters. No one should side with them. Yet members of peace movements have. Today, just as in the 1950s, vociferous members of these movements have made it clear, their major motivation is not admiration for dictators but misgivings about the United States.
Do I go too far? The other day, Harry Belafonte informed Finnish television that President Bush and his administration are "misguided … I think they are men who are possessed of evil." I wonder where Harry stood on Uncle Joe Stalin when even Joe's head of secret police thought he was too dangerous a threat to live.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide