- The Washington Times - Monday, November 17, 2003

NEW YORK (AP) — A federal appeals judge said yesterday it would be “a sea change” in the Constitution to allow the Bush administration to designate a U.S. citizen suspected in a reputed dirty-bomb plot as an enemy combatant.

In a critical showdown between the government and civil liberties lawyers, two members of a three-judge federal panel seemed hesitant to embrace the government’s reasoning for why Abdullah al-Muhajir, 33, should be held indefinitely without access to an attorney and without being charged.

Al-Muhajir, who was born Jose Padilla but took a Muslim name upon converting to Islam, is accused of plotting with al Qaeda to detonate a “dirty” bomb,” which uses conventional explosives to disperse radioactive materials.

The former Chicago gang member was taken into custody in May 2002, and has spent most of the time since then in a naval brig in Charleston, S.C.

In the two-hour hearing before the appeals panel yesterday, Deputy Solicitor General Paul D. Clement suggested that the urgency of the war against terrorism necessitated such moves.

“Al Qaeda made the battlefields the United States and they’ve given every indication they’re trying to make the United States the battlefield again,” he said.

But Judge Barrington D. Parker Jr. said he believed the power to designate a U.S. citizen as an enemy combatant rested with Congress, rather than the president.

Giving such power to the executive branch with only limited review by the courts, he said, would be “a sea change in the constitutional life of this country and … unprecedented in civilized society.”

Judge Rosemary S. Pooler, another member of the panel, said that “If, in fact, the battlefield is the United States, I think Congress has to say that, and I don’t think they have yet.” Later, she added, “As terrible as nine-eleven was, it didn’t repeal the Constitution.”

Specifically, the government was asking the court to overturn a finding by U.S. District Court Chief Judge Michael Mukasey that al-Muhajir is entitled to meet with his lawyers and contest being designated as an enemy combatant.

Jenny Martinez, a Stanford Law School professor who argued on al-Muhajir’s behalf, said the government believed it could designate anyone, even a citizen, an enemy combatant at any time.

“This new power government is looking for is entirely unprecedented,” she said.

The third panel member, Judge Richard C. Wesley, suggested the case shouldn’t have been brought in Manhattan. “This should be litigated in South Carolina,” Judge Wesley snapped.

The judges weren’t expected to issue their ruling for weeks if not longer. While two of three judges expressed doubts about the government’s arguments, they could still opt to refer the case to another court, as Judge Wesley suggested.

Al-Muhajir was arrested at Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport as he returned from Pakistan. The government said he had proposed to Abu Zubaydah, then al Qaeda’s top terrorism coordinator, to steal radioactive material to detonate a dirty bomb in the United States.

Only two other persons have been designated enemy combatants since the 2001 terrorist attacks: Ali Saleh Kahlah Al-Marri, a Qatari citizen who has been accused of being an al Qaeda sleeper agent, and Esam Hamdi, a Louisiana native captured in the fighting in Afghanistan.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide