- The Washington Times - Wednesday, November 19, 2003

Progress has made our lives a lot easier, hasn’t it? It has also made powering our lives at home a bit more expensive. Heating and cooling your home accounts for the largest part of electric bills in the United States.

When you consider that in just a 20-year period, Americans have dramatically changed the way they cool and heat their homes, you can see why the power grids are having a hard time keeping up with demand.

The U.S. Department of Energy’s statistical department, the Energy Information Administration (EIA), says bigger homes and more electrical appliances are pushing up our energy consumption, even while the cost of energy has actually remained relatively stable through the years.

Even with modern advances in insulation and energy-efficient furnaces, our homes are bigger — meaning it still costs more to heat and cool. The number of houses with seven rooms or more grew by nearly a third between 1978 and 1997, which drove the percentage of dwellings with four rooms or fewer down to 30 percent, according to EIA.

Meanwhile, we have a lot more electricity-eating appliances.

In the Midwest, for instance, the proportion of houses with central air conditioning swelled to 51 percent in 1997 — more than double the number of air-cooled homes in 1978. Air conditioning in the South grew at about the same rate, with more than 70 percent of homes using a central air-conditioning unit.

The Department of Energy’s Geothermal Technologies Program is hoping to drive down heating and air-conditioning costs in the next few years by using Mother Earth to cool and heat more homes across the country through geothermal heat pump (GHP) systems, sometimes called geoexchange systems.

The DOE Web site (www.energy.gov) explains how the GHP system works: It “moves the heat from the earth (or a groundwater source) into the home in the winter, and pulls the heat from the house and discharges it into the ground in the summer.”

“The underground (or underwater) piping loops serve as a heat source in the winter and a heat sink in the summer.”

By using the Earth to do what it does naturally — holding heat in the winter and holding coolness in the summer — a geoexchange system is considered one of the most energy-efficient, environmentally clean and cost-effective space-conditioning systems available, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.

The DOE seeks to increase installations of GHPs to 400,000 per year by 2005, hoping to push the cumulative number at that point to 2 million homes using this energy-saving system.

The systems, sometimes referred to as ground-source heat-pump systems, can cost up to $7,500 for installation for a 3-ton unit. That’s the average-size unit for heating and cooling a home. The cost is about double what you would pay for a traditional heat-pump system.

Help paying for a GHP is available. See the EPA’s Energy Star loan program (www.energystar.gov) or ask a loan officer about an energy-efficient mortgage, in which the cost of the new heat pump and other energy-conservation costs can be rolled into the total cost of the loan.

Fannie Mae has funded more than $30 million in energy-efficient mortgages nationwide since the mid-1990s, about 99 percent of which have been issued in the past three years, according to a report in the Las Vegas Sun. Las Vegas has a large contingent of Energy Star homes.

Although it’s called a heat pump, the GHP system can also cool homes with an interesting side benefit — free hot water, which is created during the cooling season and can be used in the house.

For more information on geothermal heat systems, pull down the Adobe Acrobat document “An Information Survival Kit for the Prospective Geothermal Heat Pump Owner” (geoheat.oit.edu/ghp/survival.pdf), published by the Oregon Institute of Technology.

M. Anthony Carr has written about real estate for more than 15 years. Contact him by e-mail ([email protected]).

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide