- The Washington Times - Thursday, September 4, 2003

No, it isn’t quite robots vs. zealots, but robots and “non-manned” weapon-delivery systems are trump cards in the war on terrorism. Three books, all published within the last year, provide insight into how “smart weapons and smart soldiers” interrelate.

“Robots vs. zealots” was a column I wrote in November 2002. The column examined the Predator unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) attack on an al Qaeda convoy in the badlands of eastern Yemen. The American pilot “flying” the Predator by remote control was located in Djibouti, hundreds of kilometers away from the action. Al Qaeda leader Mohammed Al-Harthi, who allegedly planned the assault on the USS Cole in 2000, was the Predator’s target. The Predator used Hellfire laser-guided missiles in the attack. A Predator also killed al Qaeda’s No. 3, Mohammed Atef, in Afghanistan in November 2001. Many experts regarded Atef as al Qaeda’s “truly gifted operational commander.”

In the wake of “robots vs. zealots,” several readers asked me to write a column discussing the development and employment of “smart weapons systems.” Other letters discussed (pro and con) the “right to strike” in “non-belligerent” Yemen, though everyone acknowledged the area is al Qaeda-infested. The Predator attack rekindled debate over “American assassination by air attack.” The targeting of a specific individual for air attack, even in a murky war against transnational terrorism, remains politically and legally gray.

Two books published this year provide solid background on the developing U.S. military network of smart sensors, smart weapons and smart soldiers. Rand analyst and Hoover Institution fellow Bruce Berkowitz’s “The New Face of War” (Free Press) supplies a broad-brush look at how information and sensor systems (like computers and satellites) are reshaping combat. He also pegs the changes as an evolution decades in the making, and shows the roots of “network war” lie in the visionary work of Cold War-era thinkers.

He also explores the Achilles heel of information warfare — the overwhelming flood of data. “U.S. intelligence is drowning in digital data,” Mr. Berkowitz writes. “During the Cold War, it was easier to detect a signal from Moscow instructing its forces to attack” because U.S. analysts knew the sender (Moscow) and the intended receiver (Soviet forces in Germany). Not so today.

Millions of potential command sources and hundreds of millions of potential recipients exist on the Internet alone. Intelligence is not raw data, but data understood in the context of capabilities and goals. Mr. Berkowitz also touches on the gray-area issues. Proliferating information systems force dispersion. “Traditional concepts of armed defense are sorely tested when armies must hide and disperse to survive. … Democratic oversight is inherently harder when victory depends … on stealth and secrecy.”

Retired Army Col. John B. Alexander’s “Winning the War — Advanced Weapons, Strategies, and Concepts for the Post-9/11 World” (St. Martin’s) combines high-tech and Green Beret hard core — but then, that’s John Alexander.

I know Col. Alexander, and as a thinker he doesn’t simply push the envelope, he often discards it. However, he never discards his incisive brand of muddy-boot common sense. This books reflects his brains and muddy infantry boots. Believe him when he writes: “Star Trek meets the History Channel might be the log line for a new television series based on future conflicts. … High tech and ancient warfare techniques will become the norm.”

My version: In the future, there will be smart bombs and bayonets. Recall Afghanistan featured Green Berets riding horses.

Howard Rheingold’s “Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution” (Perseus) was published in fall 2002. A genuine eclectic, Mr. Reingold has, among other things, worked as editor in chief of the Millennium Whole Earth Catalog. “Smart Mobs” is a cult item. It’s a broadband swipe at our immediate future and the socially transforming effects of ubiquitous, instantaneous, mobile communications.

DARPA (the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) is the driving force behind much of the communication and surveillance technology Reingold assays. The gadgets and gizmos of smart weapons and sensors brace Mr. Reingold’s emerging “smart society.” It’s a sad comment on the human condition that all too often war — if it is not the brutal mother of an invention — serves as adaptor, refiner and disseminator of revolutionary technology.

Austin Bay is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide