- The Washington Times - Saturday, August 21, 2004


At Barnard College in New York, administrators read over lifestyle surveys and even a student essay in their efforts to make a successful freshman roommate match. At Michigan, they separate the smokers but leave the rest to chance. The University of Utah lets freshmen find their own roommates from anonymous profiles online.

Part art, part science, the roommate-selection process will have a major impact on the lives of the hundreds of thousands of new college students due to arrive on campus in the coming weeks. For many, it will be their first time living with a stranger, and the stakes are high. If a blind date doesn’t fly, the pair can part ways forever. But when freshman roommates don’t get along, they may be stuck cheek by jowl for nine months.

“If you want to go to bed and they’re staying up clicking on their keys, instant-messaging … it’s going to make your college experience miserable,” said Stephanie Polak, associate director of residence life of Rider College in Lawrenceville, N.J.

So how do colleges do it? Larger schools are more likely to rely on computers, smaller ones on the human touch. Almost all ask a few basic questions, like whether students smoke, stay up late, and consider themselves neat.

Lebanon Valley College in Annville, Pa., asks students to mark which adjectives from a list of 30 — such as shy, social and religious — describe them. Since few match up perfectly, Jonathan Wescott, director of residential life, and an assistant dive in to the responses and play it by ear.

“We’re not necessarily looking to have best friends develop,” Mr. Wescott said. “If they do, that’s a bonus. What we’re looking for is them to be able to communicate their needs and frustrations.”

At Baker University in Baldwin City, Kan., Associate Dean Nancy Richard, a 24-year veteran of roommate matching, tries to pair local students with those from farther away. She hopes the far-away students will get invited to spend time on weekends with their roommates’ families. But Rider does the opposite. It worries that when local students go home on weekends, the roommates would be left alone.

Some colleges have lost faith in their matchmaking skills. Many say students often fill out housing forms with their parents hovering nearby, so questions about smoking and drinking are not necessarily accurate. Besides, students can change a lot when they get to college.

A handful of schools, including the University of Utah, have handed the responsibility over to the students themselves, who can pick roommates after viewing anonymous online profiles. The school says requests for roommate changes have fallen about 40 percent.

The old, paper-based system didn’t work for Utah student Jaimes Myers when he arrived on campus two years ago.

“We were hard-pressed to keep a friendship or even a respect between us just because there wasn’t a lot in common,” he said. But last year, with the new system, not one of the 36 freshmen he oversaw as a resident adviser had a roommate problem.

“You could see a specific personality type in each room,” he said. “It seemed like the roommates were friends before.”

Jack Lewis, now a sophomore who used the system last year, said his match turned out much better than expected.

“We had a great year,” he said. “We had many characteristics that were different, but the (lifestyle) issues were taken care of.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide