- The Washington Times - Wednesday, August 25, 2004

BOSTON (AP) — A woman who agreed to have a child with her lesbian partner, but split up with the mother before the baby’s birth, cannot be forced to pay child support, the state’s highest court ruled yesterday.

The split ruling by the Supreme Judicial Court — which legalized same-sex “marriage” in a landmark ruling last year — comes in the case of a Hampshire County lesbian couple, identified in court documents as “T.F.” and “B.L.,” who lived together from 1996 to 2000.

B.L. at first resisted T.F.’s wishes to have a child, but later changed her mind.

The couple broke up after T.F. got pregnant by artificial insemination. After the baby was born, T.F. sued her former partner for child support. A Probate and Family Court judge turned to the Massachusetts Appeals Court, which in turned passed the case on to the state’s Supreme Judicial Court.

Associate Justice Judith A. Cowin wrote that the informal agreement between the two women to have a child together did not constitute an enforceable contract, and B.L. can’t be forced to pay child support.

Three justices — including Chief Justice Margaret Marshall, who wrote the ruling legalizing same-sex “marriage” in Massachusetts — disagreed with the majority conclusion, saying that the implied contract between the women is enforceable.

“The child may have been abandoned by the defendant, but he should not be abandoned by the court,” Justice John M. Greaney wrote in the dissent.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide