- The Washington Times - Sunday, December 5, 2004

Bruce Bartlett’s recent column (“A distorted lens on Wal-Mart,” Nov. 22) attacking the “Frontline” broadcast “Is Wal-Mart good for America?” is inaccurate and has a whiff of sour grapes.

While “Frontline” producers did extensively interview Mr. Bartlett, it was at his suggestion we also contacted Brink Lindsey of the Cato Institute. Mr. Lindsey, along with others, made many of the economic and free trade points Mr. Bartlett claims were missing from the program.

In addition, the “Frontline” documentary quite clearly credited Wal-Mart with helping cut the cost of living and boosting U.S. productivity, while its strategies cut into good U.S. jobs.

As for Mr. Bartlett’s complaint that the Wal-Mart spokesperson was “ineffectual,” we should note “Frontline” sought an interview with Wal-Mart’s Chief Executive Office Lee Scott, who declined. Wal-Mart provided two spokespeople. We used both.


Executive Editor


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide