- The Washington Times - Saturday, February 21, 2004

The first concept an economics student learns is that for every benefit there’s also a cost — or, as my longtime colleague and friend Nobel Laureate Milton Friedman has put it, “There’s no free lunch.” While the person who receives the benefit might not pay or even be aware of the cost, as sure as night follows day there is a cost paid by someone.

One of the effects of competition is that of revealing costs and least-cost methods of production. When the government gave AT&T; a monopoly over much of the telecommunications industry and the Civil Aeronautics Board sponsored the airline cartel, both telecommunication and air travel were far more expensive than today. The introduction of competition not only revealed the services could be provided more cheaply, but brought about massive innovation.

International trade is a form of competition, and as such it also reveals costs and least-cost methods of production. American workers are the most productive workers in the world. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, in 2002 the United States led the world in worker productivity: U.S. workers averaged $71,600 in output each (in 1999 dollars). The next highest country was Belgium, where each worker averaged $64,100. But worker productivity can be sabotaged.

Suppose an American textile worker is paid $100 a day, while his Indian counterpart earns $20. If the American is 10 times as productive as the Indian worker, then the wage costs of using the American worker are lower.

However, $100 in wages is not the only cost of hiring the American worker. There are numerous federal and state regulations that add to worker costs, such as: Occupational Safety and Health Administration requirements, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission mandates, Social Security and Medicare, Family Medical Leave and many other workplace regulations. Added to worker costs that businesses incur are: Americans With Disabilities Act, Clean Air Act, Endangered Species Act and many other regulations.

Then there are all sorts of frivolous and not-so-frivolous lawsuits against businesses. According to an Office of Advocacy of the U.S. Small Business Administration study, “The Impact of Regulatory Costs on Small Firms,” federal regulatory costs on U.S. businesses came to $451 billion in 2000. They cost small businesses (20 or fewer employees) about $7,000 per employee; medium businesses (20 to 499 employees) paid about $4,300 per employee; and large businesses (500 employees or more) paid about $4,400 per worker.

There are no two ways about it: There are benefits from all the costly federal, state and local regulations imposed on American businesses. But we must also acknowledge our federal, state and local regulatory agencies have no jurisdiction in India, China, Southeast Asia and Latin America. That means for many products and services, people who are far less productive than we, in a physical sense, can beat us in the global marketplace.

We all can agree there’s no benefit that’s worth any cost. If that weren’t true, we’d do nearly anything that has a benefit, and that would include mandating a 5-mile-per-hour speed limit. Why? The benefits would be enormous in terms of the tens of thousands of highway fatalities and injuries avoided. We don’t have a 5-mile-per-hour speed limit because we have decided its benefit is not worth the enormous cost.

As said earlier, competition reveals costs and least-cost methods of production. One need not take a position one way or another on the worthiness of the benefits of regulation to acknowledge there are costs associated with them. But I think intelligent decisionmaking requires that we take their costs into account. It’s not intelligent to stick our heads in the sand and deceive ourselves by pretending others are to blame for our lack of competitiveness in some areas.

Walter Williams is a nationally syndicated columnist.

LOAD COMMENTS ()

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide