- The Washington Times - Thursday, January 22, 2004


Political wrangling and doubts about new technology have slowed efforts to improve the nation’s election system, leaving many states open to the same problems that caused the 2000 presidential stalemate, a new report found.

A study released yesterday by the Washington-based Election Reform Information Project found that — despite promised reforms — only a few states have made comprehensive changes to voting machines and registration in the past three years.

“This has not gone as quickly as some of us who have responsibility for the transformation would have liked,” said J. Kenneth Blackwell, Ohio’s secretary of state. “I would say, as a nation, we’re somewhere between a C-plus and a B.”

It will be 2006, at the earliest, before voters nationwide see the kinds of sweeping improvements that policy-makers said were necessary after the 2000 election.

One problem: Federal money has been slow in coming. Of $3.9 billion authorized in 2002, only $650 million has been distributed to states so far, and half of that has been focused on planning. Congress only last month appointed a federal oversight commission to handle doling out the money.

Adding to the inertia, computer scientists have raised doubts about the security of the touch-screen, ATM-style machines, which federal law encourages for the disabled and which many states are considering for widespread use.

“The expectation for reform has outstripped reality,” said Doug Chapin, director of the information project, a nonpartisan group that studies elections.

The report found that:

• Punch cards still will be used in some jurisdictions in 22 states, despite the federal Help America Vote Act’s encouragement to retire the equipment that was at the center of the Florida deadlock in 2000.

• Statewide registration databases, which should eliminate the potential for fraud and for voters mistakenly being denied the chance to vote, still are a few years off. Forty-one states sought waivers to delay action on registration until 2006.

• Although some polling places in 42 states will have new machines in place for the presidential contest, in many states that means small pilot programs in a few counties or towns, rather than wholesale improvements.

Still, there were some changes. Georgia and Maryland switched to statewide touch-screen systems; Florida — the start of all the controversy — eliminated its punch cards; and large counties in California and Texas dropped punch cards, too.

A separate study on voting technologies showed how voting has changed thus far, and how much further it has to go. This year, a third of registered voters — if they choose to cast a ballot — will use older technology that reformers had hoped to phase out, and more than half will be using the newer technology.

That’s an improvement, but not sweeping change. In 2000, 48.7 percent of registered voters had older punch cards and lever machines at their polling places, according to a preliminary analysis by Election Data Services Inc., (EDS) a Washington-based consulting firm.

This year, the newer technologies — touch screens and optical-scan equipment that reads paper ballots with filled-in ovals similar to SAT tests — will be in use for 56.6 percent of registered voters. That’s up from 43 percent.

“The changes that everybody wanted to happen just aren’t happening,” EDS President Kimball Brace said. “And it also raises the possibility that in a close election, we get another Florida-type situation.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide