- The Washington Times - Saturday, January 31, 2004

WUERZBURG, Germany — The United States was justified in going to war against Iraq because Saddam Hussein violated U.N. resolutions ordering him to disarm, the Pentagon’s second-in-command said yesterday.

Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz said flawed intelligence about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction should be investigated, but the inability of inspectors to find such weapons did not mean the war was unnecessary.

David Kay, the former chief weapons inspector in Iraq, said last week he believes Saddam probably did not have the stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons that President Bush claimed as justification for the invasion in March.

“You have to make decisions based on the intelligence you have, not on the intelligence you can discover later,” Mr. Wolfowitz said while visiting the headquarters of the Army’s 1st Infantry Division.

The division is preparing to ship out beginning next week for Iraq, where it will replace the 4th Infantry Division in the dangerous north-central part of the country.

Mr. Wolfowitz said he retains confidence in American intelligence agencies, despite their apparent mistakes about Iraq’s weapons programs. “You need to look into when you got it right, and when you got it wrong,” Mr. Wolfowitz said. “It’s important to understand we could not possibly do what we need to do in the world without intelligence.”

Mr. Wolfowitz said deposing Saddam was important to bring freedom to the Middle East.

“We have an absolutely important job to do to help the Iraqi people build a free and democratic Iraq,” he said. “It’s going to be a very important turning point in the war on terrorism. The Middle East has been heading down the wrong road for some years now.”

Earlier yesterday, Mr. Wolfowitz met with troops and their families. Soldiers’ spouses complained that American troops need time to rest between their frequent missions.

Bonnie McCarty said her husband is preparing for a yearlong tour of duty in Iraq. “When he comes back, does this mean in another year he’s going to go back again because the size of the Army isn’t big enough?” Mrs. McCarty asked Mr. Wolfowitz. “We don’t want to keep going through this.”

Mr. Wolfowitz said the Army is considering an increase in the number of combat units to ease the strain.

He said he and other Pentagon officials know that the last several years have been difficult for soldiers and their families and are trying to ease the strain. Mr. Wolfowitz said Pentagon officials are not sure, however, that permanently enlarging the Army is the answer.

“There’s a big uncertainty about what we’re going to need in the future, ” Mr. Wolfowitz said.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide