- The Washington Times - Thursday, June 10, 2004

BOISE, Idaho (AP) — A Saudi graduate student was acquitted yesterday of charges that he used his computer expertise to foster terrorism.

The case against Sami Omar Al-Hussayen, 34, was seen as an important test of a provision of the Patriot Act that makes it a crime to provide expert advice or assistance to terrorists. First Amendment advocates called the verdict a victory for free speech.

Mr. Al-Hussayen, a computer science student at the University of Idaho, set up and ran Web sites that prosecutors said were used to recruit terrorists, raise money and disseminate inflammatory rhetoric.

His defense maintained that his association with the Web sites was as a Muslim volunteer and computer expert who simply wanted to keep the sites in operation.

Mr. Al-Hussayen’s attorneys argued that he had little to do with the creation of the material posted. They said the material was protected by the First Amendment right to freedom of expression and was not designed to raise money or recruit militants.

“It was hard to imagine how they could have convicted on the terrorism charges in light of the First Amendment,” said Jack Van Valkenburgh, executive director of the Idaho chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union. “What I heard from prosecution were only allegations of constitutionally protected speech, so I’m relieved.”

Prosecutors said Mr. Al-Hussayen turned Web sites of the Islamic Assembly of North America into an Internet network providing information to foster terrorism, particularly in the Middle East and Chechnya.

They cited religious edicts justifying suicide bombings and an invitation to financially support the militant Palestinian organization Hamas in arguing that Mr. Al-Hussayen should be convicted.

Mr. Al-Hussayen was acquitted on all three terrorism counts, as well as one count of making a false statement and two counts of visa fraud. Jurors could not reach verdicts on three more false statement counts and five additional visa fraud counts, and a mistrial was declared on those charges.

Mr. Al-Hussayen faced up to 15 years in prison for each terrorism charge, 25 years for each visa fraud charge and five years for each false statement charge.

The jury reached its verdict after seven days of deliberations and a trial that lasted seven weeks.

Mr. Al-Hussayen had appeared confident throughout the day, but had no visible reaction as the verdicts were read.

“What he said to me was, ‘Calm down, it’s going to be OK,’” Mr. Al-Hussayen’s lead defense attorney, David Nevin, said just after the verdict was read.

Mr. Al-Hussayen faced deportation regardless of the trial’s outcome. His wife and their children returned to Saudi Arabia earlier this year rather than fight deportation.

John Dickinson, a University of Idaho professor who served as Mr. Al-Hussayen’s academic adviser, said he hopes that the acquittal “puts an end to a long and terrible aspect of Sami’s life, and I hope he will be reunited with his wife and three children.”

Mr. Al-Hussayen, a member of a prominent family from the Saudi capital, Riyadh, had been jailed since his February 2003 arrest, continuing to work toward his doctorate from his cell.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide