- The Washington Times - Friday, June 18, 2004

Bill Clinton’s memoir hits bookstores next week, but one story you’re not likely to read in its pages involves Mr. Clinton’s friendship with Arthur A. Coia.

The debonair former president of the Laborers International Union of North America (LIUNA) was one of the Democratic Party’s biggest contributors when Mr. Clinton was in office. In the first four years of the Clinton administration alone, LIUNA gave $4.8 million to Democrat candidates and the Democratic Party. Though Mr. Clinton had contact with Mr. Coia no fewer than 120 times, their association is an awkward memory for the former president, given the latter’s ties to organized crime and that of the union he once headed.

In 1986, President Reagan’s Commission on Organized Crime identified LIUNA as one of the “bad four” — the most corrupt unions in the nation — along with the Teamsters, the Hotel Employees and Restaurant Workers, and the International Association of Longshoremen.

According to congressional testimony by the FBI, each of these union’s presidents at the time had been “handpicked by La Cosa Nostra.” Angelo Fosco, who served as LIUNA president from 1975-1993, won re-election while under federal indictment for union racketeering — a victory won by “use of force and threats of violence against potential competitors,” according to the Reagan Crime Commission.

And Mr. Coia was no exception. He became secretary treasurer of LIUNA in 1987, the No. 2 job in the union, with the blessings of the Chicago mob, as Mr. Coia admitted in sworn testimony. When Mr. Clinton tried to reward Mr. Coia for his political contributions by appointing him to a prestigious presidential commission, the Council on Competitiveness, the appointment set off alarm bells at the FBI.

In a memo, investigators doing a background check wrote, “Coia is a criminal associate of the New England Patriarca organized crime family.” The bureau also warned the White House that “within the next several weeks” the Justice Department “will accuse Coia of being a puppet of the LCN [La Cosa Nostra].” Associate Deputy Attorney General David Margolis in vain even tried calling to warn White House officials not to get too close to the alleged mob-controlled union boss.

Although Mr. Clinton dropped plans to name Mr. Coia to the Council on Competitiveness, he continued to meet with the union leader, exchanged expensive gifts and frequent notes with him, and invited him to travel aboard the presidential aircraft on a trip to Rhode Island.

All this occurred while the Justice Department prepared a racketeering complaint against Mr. Coia and his union. On Nov. 4, 1994, the Justice’s Organized Crime and Racketeering Section served Mr. Coia with a 212-page draft complaint.

“Then something strange happened,” the liberal muckraking magazine Washington Monthly noted at the time. Instead of indicting Mr. Coia, the Justice Department worked out a sweetheart deal allowing Mr. Coia to avoid prosecution and keep his job, while a federally appointed investigator pursued lower-level mobsters within the union.

Just days before the Justice Department offered the deal, Hillary Clinton addressed the annual LIUNA conference in Miami on Feb. 6, 1995, despite Justice Department warnings.

The decision not to move forward with its complaint shocked everyone, except perhaps Mr. Coia. The Justice Department had previously filed racketeering charges in 15 other union cases, taking over the corrupt unions’ operations.

But Mr. Clinton couldn’t protect his union benefactor forever — especially when Mr. Coia himself couldn’t keep his hands out of the union cookie jar. In January 2000, Arthur Coia pleaded guilty for failing to pay taxes on the purchase of three Ferraris from a Rhode Island car dealer who held a million-dollar leasing agreement with the union. As part of his plea agreement, Mr. Coia stepped down as LIUNA president but was allowed to keep his $250,000 yearly salary for life.

If the Clinton administration’s dealings with Arthur Coia and the Laborers Union were an isolated incident, it would be bad enough, but the corrupting nexus between union money and Democratic political power was especially tight during the Clinton years. And the unions’ role in financing Democrats didn’t end when Bill Clinton left office.

This election, unions will spend about $800 million, much of it hidden in salaries for union officials assigned to work on political campaigns, member communications, get-out-the-vote efforts, and other unregulated contributions overwhelmingly to Democrats. But don’t expect to read about it on Page One of the New York Times or in Mr. Clinton’s memoir.

Linda Chavez is a nationally syndicated columnist and author of the new book, “Betrayal: How Union Bosses Shake Down Their Members and Corrupt American Politics.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide