- The Washington Times - Wednesday, June 30, 2004

World stock markets applauded the sooner-than-expected U.S. handover to Iraq. Energy prices fell significantly. Former Coalition Administrator Paul Bremer immediately took the next plane out of town. Things are looking up. Wasn’t it Sinatra who sang “love is lovelier the second time around”?

Quoting from the Hoboken, N.J., crooner is not as far fetched as one might think. Here is market strategist Barry Ritholtz on the surprise handover decision:

“The Neo-Conservative hawks who pressed for the invasion of Iraq failed to create an adequate strategy for a postwar period. This created an opportunity for insurgents to cause havoc and mayhem. With the handover to the Iraqi Ruling Council a few days early, the planners have gotten one right for a change.”

Speaking to National Public Radio, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage talked about the benefit of “somehow confusing the [terrorists’] plans, or what we believe are plans, to disrupt the proceedings.” Ah, we are learning. The second time around.

In the same vein, a New York Times front-page headline (believe it or not) declared “Army used speed and might, plus cash, against Shi’ite rebel.” The story went on to say “the campaign was a mix of military tactics, political maneuverings, media management, and a generous dollop of cash for quickly rebuilding war-ravaged cities — a formula that … could become a model for future fighting against the persistent insurrections plaguing Iraq.”

In other words, American forces are starting to figure out how to win the postwar battle. And they will get some help from the new Iraqi government. A new poll of Iraqis shows 68 percent have confidence in the interim government, 73 percent approve of the Prime Minister Ayad Allawi, and 84 percent approve of President Ghazi Yawar. Nearly 80 percent of Iraqis expect the new government will “make things better” for Iraq after the handover.

Of course, all this is a positive turn of events for President George W. Bush, who is in the fight of his life in the re-election campaign against Sen. John F. Kerry, Massachusetts Democrat. The economy is throwing off plenty of good news for Mr. Bush, with private-sector gross domestic product (minus all that defense spending) growing 51/2 percent over the past four quarters, wage and salary income rising 5.1 percent, and 1.4 million newly created jobs since last summer.

Trouble is, bad news from Iraq has drowned out good news from the economy. As a result, last year’s spectacular stock-market rally generated by Bush’s base constituency — an investor class of 95 million shareholders who are eternally grateful for tax cuts on dividends, capital gains, and personal income, and who cast 2 of every 3 votes in the last two election cycles — have lost some of the re-election faith as the stock market stalled during the first-half of this year.

There has been some good news for the commander in chief on the political front. A recent Zogby poll shows Mr. Bush improving in the key battleground states. Conducted June 14-19, the survey shows Mr. Bush winning 285 Electoral College votes, compared to 253 for Mr. Kerry.

Sen. John McCain, Arizona Republican, deprived Mr. Kerry of his dream-ticket vice-presidential choice when Mr. McCain strongly endorsed Mr. Bush for re-election.

Even Russian President Vladimir Putin contributed positively to the Bush re-election campaign by telling the world Russian intelligence had evidence Saddam Hussein intended to attack the United States. This is a bullet point that will undoubtedly resurface during the Bush-Kerry debates this fall.

Mr. Bush did wrangle a 15-to-0 victory in a watered-down U.N. Security Council endorsement of the Iraqi handover. Even punier, but still something, a shadow-of-its-former-self NATO will provide token support in the form of training for Iraqi security personnel.

Mr. Kerry has already retreated from his “jobless recovery” attack, and is now reduced to nitpicking the Bush boom with blandishments about helping the middle class. But tax increases don’t help anyone. And the Bushies are right in new ads that argue “pessimism never created a new job.”

As for Mr. Kerry’s other great campaign issue, “internationalizing the war,” the U.N. and NATO decisions, along with the Iraqi handover, are events that substantially undercut this charge. Not even Divine Providence can budge the French and Germans who grew fat on Saddam’s Oil-for-Food U.N. bounty and grew thin on shrinking defense resources caused by recessionary economies.

It takes a lot to unhorse an incumbent. In normal times, a booming economy such as this would be more than sufficient to create a landslide for Mr. Bush.

Global terrorism and Iraq have made these times anything but normal. But any good news at all from the war fronts will surely generate another big stock-market rally. Watch stocks for the best leading election indicator.

Lawrence Kudlow is a nationally syndicated columnist and is chief executive officer of Kudlow & Co., LLC, and CNBC’s economics commentator.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide