- The Washington Times - Friday, May 21, 2004

In the Arabic-speaking world, there is a phrase that often rings from the lips of someone who has heard good news. The phrase is: “Al hamdulillah.” Praise be to God.

When I studied Arabic at the American University in Cairo 20 years ago, I often heard this lyrical construction. But there was another phrase I heard more often: “Insha’allah.” If God wills it. It was a reminder of the humility proper to all human enterprises: Certain ends are beyond earthly means.

I was reminded of these two Arabic phrases as I read what Secretary of State Colin Powell said last week when asked whether U.S. forces would leave Iraq if asked to by the not-yet-appointed interim Iraqi government scheduled to take power June 30. Mr. Powell prefaced his answer by prognosticating that this temporary administration “will welcome the continued presence and operation of coalition military forces.” But he concluded: “[W]ere this interim government to say to us, ‘We really think we can handle this on our own. It would be better if you were to leave,’ we would leave.”

Surely this was met with al-hamdulillahs from Basra to Mosul. A Coalition Provisional Authority poll in late March and early April — before both the fitful siege of Fallujah and release of the abuse pictures from Abu Ghraib — showed 82 percent of Iraqis disapproved of the coalition occupation of their country. If Iraq had self-determination, it would send U.S. forces home.

Yet, this does not necessarily represent a conflict of interests between Iraqis and Americans. They want our forces to leave as soon as possible; we want our forces home as soon as possible. President Bush himself has made almost a mantra of saying we will stay in Iraq “as long as necessary and not one day more.”

The real debate is not about whether our troops should come home; it is about what would make it “necessary” for them to stay. This can be determined only in reference to what one sees as the ultimate aim of the war. And that inevitably divides traditionalists from ideologues.

Traditionalists believe wars must only be fought as a last resort to defend the nation against grave security threats. Ideologues believe wars ought to be fought to advance some ideal they enshrine as an international agenda.

George Washington was the prototype American traditionalist. He steered America clear of aligning itself with Revolutionary France in France’s ideological conflict with the constitutional monarchy in England. Woodrow Wilson was the prototype ideologue. He insisted on recasting World War I as a war to make the world safe for democracy, and as an ironic result ended up making the world more dangerous for all.

A traditionalist view of the war in Iraq is that it was to eliminate the threat Saddam’s regime posed to the U.S. and our allies. An ideological view is that it was to make first Iraq, then the broader Middle East, safe for democracy.

The ideological war is clearly a long way from the stopping point. As long as factions in Iraq are willing to obstruct the march toward Madisonian principles in Mesopotamia, U.S. forces have an enemy there. The ironic logic of the ideological war says we will give Iraqis democracy whether they want it or not.

The ideologues cannot accept Mr. Powell’s declaration that we will leave as soon as an Iraqi government asks us to leave, because the Iraqi government that asks us to leave may not be the democracy that is the ideologues’ war aim.

Traditionalists have a different reason to be wary of Mr. Powell’s declaration: It could cause us to leave behind an Iraq that is an equal or greater threat than the one we invaded. Victory means removing the threat, not giving it a makeover.

But victory can be achieved by insisting to Iraqis, as they move forward in determining their own political destiny, that there are just three commandments they must obey:

(1) Thou shalt not invade thy neighbor.

(2) Thou shalt not make weapons of mass destruction.

(3) Thou shalt not consort with terrorists.

When it is reasonable to assume we can make Iraq keep these commandments without keeping troops in Iraq, our troops can come home. Al hamdulillah. Will democracy dawn over Baghdad before that day? Insha’allah.

Terence P. Jeffrey is editor of Human Events and a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide