- The Washington Times - Wednesday, November 3, 2004

CHICAGO (AP) — Experiments in which new cancer drugs are tested on patients are not as risky as they were a decade ago, according to a study that found a sharp drop in deaths from 1991 to 2002.

At the same time, there was also a decline in the percentage of tumors that shrank in response to the drugs being tested. But the researchers and other cancer specialists said that does not mean the drugs were increasingly ineffective.

Some of the newest cancer drugs employ a more targeted approach than older medicines, attacking tumor cells while causing less damage to healthy tissue. These drugs often work by stopping but not necessarily reversing tumor growth, said Dr. Thomas Roberts Jr. of Massachusetts General Hospital, the study’s lead author.

The development of such drugs plus better attention to patient safety may explain the declining death rate, Dr. Roberts said.

There were 35 drug-related deaths in the 213 studies examined, but such deaths were much more frequent in the earlier experiments than in the more recent ones. There were 24 drug-linked deaths in studies from 1991 to 1994, 10 from 1995 to 1998 and one from 1999 to 2002.

Deaths from other causes, including cancer, also decreased — from 39 to 17 in the more recent studies.

Dr. Mace Rothenberg, a Vanderbilt University cancer research specialist who was not involved in the study, called the findings “clearly good news.”

“It indicates that patients who agree to go on to these fairly risky studies are not placing themselves at an unacceptably high risk for severe toxicity or death,” he said.

The studies involved 6,474 patients, and the overall death rate fell from 3 percent to 1 percent.

The researchers said there has been increased oversight of human experiments during the past decade. For example, they said, many institutions have developed educational programs for researchers and hired additional staff to oversee research.

Dr. Roberts said it was encouraging to find fewer drug-linked deaths as well as a decline in cancer-related deaths.

“They are significant because this is something that really matters to patients I think when they are considering whether to proceed with standard treatments or experimental treatments,” he said.

His report appeared in yesterday’s Journal of the American Medical Association.

The studies involved Phase I clinical trials, the first time experimental drugs are tested in humans. These are small studies designed mainly to test the safety of an experimental treatment and to determine the maximum tolerable dose.

Patients who participate in Phase I cancer studies generally have advanced disease that has not responded to conventional treatments. Although many hope participating will improve their health, that is not the primary goal in such studies.

The patients involved had various types of cancer, including colon, lung, kidney, breast and prostate tumors.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More

Click to Hide