- The Washington Times - Thursday, October 7, 2004

This is not a review of Philip Roth’s “The Plot Against America.” Instead, it’s a review, or rumination, on the suicidal self-absorption of the 21st-century left, that enlightened camp that believes Dan Rather would never pass phony docs to manipulate an election, that liar-propagandist Michael Moore deserved that presidential box seat at the Democratic Convention, that John Kerry is the spine-endowed, if manicured, epitome of consistency and that President Bush is a crypto-fascist. And it has seized on the Roth book.Gullible? That’s a nice word for it. But not sanguine. Something keeps the left up at night, but not visions of a biochem attack at the World Series. That nightmare is too realistic. What the left fears — all the left has to fear, as grand old reprobate Ted Kennedy put it, twisting the celebrated words of FDR — is four more years of George W. Bush. The Village Voice captures this mood in its Roth review: The book “makes one feel that the worst for this country is not only possible but near.” Again, not a jihadist attack, but a second Bush term.

What connects Mr. Roth’s fantasy-history to Election 2004? The novel explores what might have happened had FDR been defeated in 1940 by trans-Atlantic flight pioneer and Nazi admirer Charles Lindbergh. And? The Washington Post’s Jonathan Yardley clues us in: The “subtext gives every appearance of being an attack on George W. Bush.” Old new leftist Paul Berman, writing in The New York Times Book Review, elaborates: “Roth shows us how swiftly the rights and democratic customs of American life are lost under the authoritarian guidance of President Lindbergh and his cloyingly named ‘Just Folks’ program.” The program, he writes, “sets out to break up Jewish families and neighborhoods by scattering Jewish children into the Christian heartland.” Persecution and pogroms — fictional — follow.

There is something gratingly noxious about depicting imaginary American-Jewish suffering at the hands of American Christians at a time when both Jews and Christians are increasingly targeted by specifically Islamist terrorism. But what have Mr. Roth’s feverish fictions about a dovish-isolationist President Lindbergh — who defeats hawkish-interventionist FDR — to do with the hawkish-interventionist Bush administration? Mr. Berman writes: “You find yourself reflecting on the equally cloying Patriot Act and the hardships of immigrants from Muslim countries.”

You do? Some might wonder what prompts a MacArthur Foundation “genius” to link a junk-sci-fi plan for “scattering Jewish children into the Christian heartland” with the Patriot Act, a post-September 11 measure that has stymied numerous potentially cataclysmic terrorist conspiracies. Mr. Berman calls the Patriot Act “cloying”; I call it a lifesaver.

And what of “scattered Jews” and “Muslim hardships”? Critic-hysteric Frank Rich — who praises “the light [the book] casts on this present American moment” — also sees a parallel in the “alien” aspect to “many in the heartland” of both “Jews in the 1930s” and today’s American Muslims. But there’s no way, in fact or fiction, to equate the experience of 1930s Jews with that of post-2001 Muslims. This isn’t just because of a Muslim history of persecuting Jews. Or just because alarming numbers of Muslims today are sympathetic to Osama bin Laden, who hopes to eradicate Jews (and Christians). Or because Arab-Muslim countries were Third Reich allies. Or because Muslim anti-Semitism — a feature of the left — has again made Europe a perilous place for Jews.

The fact is, until Muslims leave holy war against non-Muslims in the eighth century, we will have Muslim terrorism. Post-2001, that terrorism — not the Patriot Act — has curtailed liberties, cost blood and treasure and destroyed hard-won peace of mind. If this irrefutable fact results in Mr. Berman’s idea of Muslim “hardships” — profiling? surveillance? — there’s a reason: You will find it in the absence of the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan. As for Jews, their “hardships” — six million murdered in death camps, to name one — resulted from being Jews.

Such facts are invisible to a left blinded by its hatred of Mr. Bush. They read about a fantasy-fascist in the White House who persecutes the Jewish minority, and, instead of yelling “Claptrap!” they call for George W. Bush’s head on an electoral platter. In urging Steven Spielberg to film the Roth book, New York Magazine makes this clear: The celebrated director “must literalize” — literalize? — “Roth’s metaphors,” the mag writes. ” ‘1940’ is actually 2001; ‘Lindbergh’ is, of course, W.; the craven antiwar lies of the American Firsters are in fact the craven pro-war lies of the American Enterprise Institute; and ‘American Jews’… whose rights and protections are slowly stripped away by a hostile government … are, of course, Arab-Americans.”

Actually? In fact? Of course? Sounds like a real plot against America.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide